-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[BI-2055] - Remove missingValueString tablesaw values #1
Changes from all commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -528,7 +528,7 @@ void testWithMissingValue2() throws IOException { | |
|
||
Table t = Table.read().csv("../data/missing_values2.csv"); | ||
assertEquals(1, t.stringColumn(0).countMissing()); | ||
assertEquals(1, t.numberColumn(1).countMissing()); | ||
assertEquals(0, t.numberColumn(1).countMissing()); | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Why was this change needed? There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. The test counts missing values, which includes both values in the MISSING_INDICATORS that were turned to an empty string, as well as the empty string itself. Removing values from MISSING_INDICATORS meant that one of the values in the csv was no longer a missing value, and so the count in the test had to be adjusted. |
||
assertEquals(0, t.numberColumn(2).countMissing()); | ||
} | ||
|
||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Does it make sense to keep lines 25-31 around in this file at all, if those variables are not used?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good catch! I was admittedly doing the bare minimum to obtain the desired change in functionality lest I accidentally break something else, but that is something that can be reasonably removed, so just added a commit!