-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 19
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
(Sentinel) DAL rest network delay checker #2326
Conversation
Caution Review failedThe pull request is closed. 📝 Walkthrough📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe changes in this pull request involve modifications to the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
node/pkg/checker/dal/types.go (1)
15-15
: Add documentation for NetworkDelayThresholdWhile the constant follows the established naming convention and is well-placed with other timing constants, please add a comment explaining:
- The significance of this 6-second threshold
- What happens when this threshold is exceeded
- Why this specific duration was chosen
node/pkg/checker/dal/app.go (2)
112-114
: Consider moving network delay tracking to a dedicated structureThe network delay counter is currently managed at the function level. Consider moving it to a dedicated structure alongside other monitoring state, similar to how
UpdateTimes
is implemented. This would provide better encapsulation and state management.type DalMonitor struct { alarmCount map[string]int wsDelayAlarmCount map[string]int + networkDelayAlarmCount int // ... other fields }
140-141
: Add documentation for the networkDelayAlarmCount parameterThe function signature change looks good, but consider adding documentation to explain the purpose and behavior of the networkDelayAlarmCount parameter.
+// checkDal verifies the DAL endpoint health by checking response times and data freshness. +// networkDelayAlarmCount tracks consecutive network delays exceeding the threshold. func checkDal(endpoint string, key string, alarmCount map[string]int, networkDelayAlarmCount int) error {
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
node/pkg/checker/dal/app.go
(3 hunks)node/pkg/checker/dal/types.go
(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 golangci-lint (1.62.2)
node/pkg/checker/dal/app.go
155-155: ineffectual assignment to networkDelayAlarmCount
(ineffassign)
158-158: ineffectual assignment to networkDelayAlarmCount
(ineffassign)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
node/pkg/checker/dal/types.go (1)
15-15
: Verify if 6 seconds is an appropriate threshold for network delays
The 6-second network delay threshold seems high and might impact user experience. Let's verify this value against production metrics.
Consider:
- Implementing a configurable threshold that can be adjusted based on environment (development, staging, production)
- Adding monitoring and alerting for when delays approach this threshold
- Implementing gradual degradation or circuit breaking patterns instead of a hard threshold
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more context about the delay thresholds and their usage.
The 6-second network delay threshold is appropriate within the system's context
The NetworkDelayThreshold of 6 seconds is well-aligned with other delay thresholds in the system:
- It's consistent with similar timeouts like
VolumeFetchTimeout
(6s) - It sits between
DelayOffset
(5s) andWsDelayThreshold
(9s) - The system has built-in safeguards:
- Alarms only trigger after multiple occurrences (
AlarmOffsetInTotal = 3
) - Network delays are added to the
DelayOffset
in calculations - Debug logging is in place to monitor the actual delays
- Alarms only trigger after multiple occurrences (
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for any existing network delay metrics or configurations in the codebase
# that might help validate this threshold value
# Look for network delay related configurations
echo "Searching for network delay related configurations..."
rg -i "network.*delay|delay.*network" --type go
# Look for any metrics collection related to network delays
echo "Searching for metrics collection..."
rg -i "metrics.*network|network.*latency|network.*delay" --type go
# Look for any related tests that might validate this threshold
echo "Searching for related tests..."
rg -i "test.*network.*delay|network.*delay.*test" --type go
Length of output: 2611
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Look for other delay thresholds in the codebase for comparison
echo "Searching for delay thresholds..."
rg -i "time\.Second.*=|=.*time\.Second" --type go
# Look for DelayOffset constant referenced in the code
echo "Searching for DelayOffset usage..."
rg "DelayOffset" --type go -A 2
# Look for AlarmOffsetInTotal to understand the alarm mechanism
echo "Searching for AlarmOffsetInTotal..."
rg "AlarmOffsetInTotal" --type go -A 2
Length of output: 7371
node/pkg/checker/dal/app.go (1)
Line range hint 117-124
: LGTM! Error handling and logging are appropriate
The function call and surrounding error handling are well-implemented.
Description
checks network delay of dal
returns error if delayed more than certain threshold
Type of change
Please delete options that are not relevant.
Checklist before requesting a review
Deployment