(Node) Reduce ping error loggings #2295
Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@nick-bisonai has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 17 minutes and 22 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📝 Walkthrough📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe changes in this pull request involve updates to the Hardhat configuration file and modifications to logging behavior in the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 4
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
node/pkg/checker/ping/app.go (1)
Line range hint
161-195: Holistic review: Balancing reduced logging with maintaining visibilityThe changes consistently reduce the log level from
ErrortoInfofor various ping-related events, which aligns with the PR objective of reducing ping error loggings. However, this approach might impact the ability to detect and respond to network issues effectively.Consider implementing a more nuanced logging strategy:
- Introduce log levels between
InfoandError(e.g.,Warn) for events that exceed certain thresholds or represent repeated failures.- Implement a dynamic logging mechanism that adjusts the log level based on the frequency and persistence of issues.
- Add more context to log messages, including metrics like failure counts, delays, and thresholds.
- Consider implementing a summary logging mechanism that provides an overview of ping performance at regular intervals or when certain conditions are met.
These improvements would help maintain visibility of important network events while reducing noise from transient issues.
To implement these suggestions effectively, consider creating a dedicated
PingLoggerstruct that encapsulates the logging logic:type PingLogger struct { failCounts map[string]int lastErrorTime map[string]time.Time } func (pl *PingLogger) LogPingResult(result PingResult, threshold time.Duration) { logEvent := log.Info() if !result.Success { pl.failCounts[result.Address]++ if pl.failCounts[result.Address] >= DefaultMaxFails { logEvent = log.Warn() } } else if result.Delay > threshold { logEvent = log.Warn() } logEvent. Str("endpoint", result.Address). Bool("success", result.Success). Dur("delay", result.Delay). Int("fail_count", pl.failCounts[result.Address]). Msg("Ping result") // Reset fail count on success if result.Success { pl.failCounts[result.Address] = 0 } }This approach would centralize the logging logic, make it easier to maintain and adjust, and provide consistent, informative log messages across the application.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
.github/workflows/node.test.yamlis excluded by!**/*.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- inspector/hardhat.config.ts (2 hunks)
- node/pkg/checker/ping/app.go (2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
node/pkg/checker/ping/app.go (1)
161-161: Consider the impact of reducing log severity for ping failuresChanging the log level from
ErrortoInfofor failed ping attempts aligns with the PR objective of reducing ping error loggings. However, this change might hide important information about connectivity issues.Consider the following points:
- Are these ping failures expected to occur frequently in normal operation?
- Could reducing the log level potentially mask critical network problems?
- Is there a way to maintain visibility of persistent failures while reducing noise from transient issues?
To assess the frequency and impact of these log messages, we can analyze the current logs:
This will help determine if the current error logs are indeed too noisy and if this change is justified.
✅ Verification successful
Verified: Log level change for ping failures is correctly implemented
The log level for failed ping attempts has been successfully changed from
ErrortoInfo, and noErrorlevel logs remain for "failed to ping endpoint".
node/pkg/checker/ping/app.goincludes two instances oflog.Info().Msg("failed to ping endpoint"), confirming the removal ofErrorlevel logs.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for current error logs related to ping failures rg --type=log "failed to ping endpoint" /var/log/application.log | wc -lLength of output: 141
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search the entire repository for the log message "failed to ping endpoint" rg "failed\.to\.ping\.endpoint" --glob "*.go" .Length of output: 49
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Corrected search for the log message "failed to ping endpoint" in .go files rg "failed to ping endpoint" --glob "*.go" .Length of output: 233
Description
Please include a summary of the changes and the related issue.
Please also include relevant motivation and context.
List any dependencies that are required for this change.
Fixes # (issue)
Type of change
Please delete options that are not relevant.
Checklist before requesting a review
Deployment