add bridge warning

[aymericdelab]

Summary by CodeRabbit

• New Features

  • Added a critical security warning regarding the vulnerability of a player's Realm during the bridging process.
  • Introduced a "Security Best Practices" section with recommendations for players.

• Bug Fixes

  • Removed redundant phrasing to clarify the permanent closure of the Game Bridge.

• Documentation

  • Enhanced content for better understanding of bridging processes and security measures.

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name	Status	Preview	Comments	Updated (UTC)
eternum	✅ Ready (Inspect)	Visit Preview	💬 Add feedback	Dec 21, 2024 6:29pm
eternum-docs	✅ Ready (Inspect)	Visit Preview	💬 Add feedback	Dec 21, 2024 6:29pm

1 Skipped Deployment

Name	Status	Preview	Comments	Updated (UTC)
eternum-landing	⬜️ Ignored (Inspect)	Visit Preview		Dec 21, 2024 6:29pm

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The pull request modifies the bridging.mdx documentation file to enhance clarity and security guidance for players during the game bridge process. The changes focus on streamlining the explanation of the Game Bridge's closure timeline and introducing a new security warning section. The documentation now provides more explicit guidance about potential risks during bridging and recommends specific best practices to protect player resources.

Changes

File	Change Summary
docs/pages/overview/bridging.mdx	- Removed redundant phrase about Game Bridge closure - Added security warning callout about Realm vulnerability - Introduced "Security Best Practices" section with two recommendations

Poem

🐰 A Bridging Bunny's Ballad 🌉

Hop carefully across the game's divide,
Where resources and risks collide,
Protect your Realm with watchful might,
Withdraw swiftly, keep dangers out of sight!
A bridge of caution, a path so bright! 🛡️

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[mentatbot]

You are out of MentatBot reviews. Your usage will refresh December 23 at 08:00 AM.

[github-actions]

Failed to generate code suggestions for PR

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)

docs/pages/overview/bridging.mdx (2)

43-48: Consider adding more specifics about the "final withdrawal step".

The security warning effectively communicates the risk of resource theft during bridging. However, it could be more explicit about what constitutes the "final withdrawal step" to ensure users don't miss this critical action.

Consider adding a reference to "Step 2: Finalize the bridge" section or briefly explaining what the final withdrawal step entails:

  ### ⚠️ Critical Security Warning ⚠️ - Your Realm remains vulnerable to being claimed by other players until you
- complete the **final withdrawal step**
+ complete the **final withdrawal step** (see "Step 2: Finalize the bridge" below)

---

58-64: Consider linking these practices to the security warning above.

The security best practices are clear and actionable. To strengthen the connection with the previous warning, consider adding a brief reference.

Consider this enhancement:

 ### Security Best Practices

-To ensure safe bridging:
+To protect against the risks mentioned in the security warning above:

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between b4b9145 and d8202ca.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• docs/pages/overview/bridging.mdx (3 hunks)

🔇 Additional comments (1)

docs/pages/overview/bridging.mdx (1)

6-7: LGTM! Clear and concise warning message.

The modified warning effectively communicates the critical timeline while removing redundancy. The bold emphasis on key points and the link to the full disclaimer enhance clarity.