Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Asset request type #99

Closed
wants to merge 5 commits into from
Closed

Asset request type #99

wants to merge 5 commits into from

Conversation

LeonardTibben
Copy link
Contributor

fix for issue: AssetType struct in a Request Models module #98

#98

@kevin-pease kevin-pease linked an issue Aug 20, 2024 that may be closed by this pull request
Copy link
Collaborator

@tluijken tluijken left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Dit is een mooie wijziging! Ik heb nog wel een opmerking op de uitgequote unit tests.

Comment on lines 130 to 131
// assert_eq!(response.selling().asset_code().as_ref().unwrap(), SELLING_ASSET_CODE);
// assert_eq!(response.selling().asset_issuer().as_ref().unwrap(), SELLING_ASSET_ISSUER);
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is er een reden deze uit te quoten? Als de velden nog steeds bestaan zou ik deze check graag intact gelaten zien. Als ze niet mee bestaan mogen ze weg.

Comment on lines 167 to 168
// assert_eq!(record.selling().asset_code().as_ref().unwrap(), SELLING_ASSET_CODE);
// assert_eq!(record.selling().asset_issuer().as_ref().unwrap(), SELLING_ASSET_ISSUER);
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is er een reden deze uit te quoten? Als de velden nog steeds bestaan zou ik deze check graag intact gelaten zien. Als ze niet mee bestaan mogen ze weg.

@tluijken
Copy link
Collaborator

Done manually on develop together

@tluijken tluijken closed this Sep 10, 2024
@tluijken tluijken deleted the asset-request-type branch September 10, 2024 15:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

AssetType struct in a Request Models module
2 participants