Refactor to Binary plugins #337
Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@csikb has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 11 minutes and 14 seconds before requesting another review. How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. WalkthroughThe changes involve significant updates to project configuration files, including a simplification of the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (5)
server/build.gradle.kts (1)
2-4: LGTM! The plugin identifiers have been updated consistently.The changes suggest a shift towards a more organized structure for plugin management by introducing a namespace prefix
hu.bsstudioto the plugin identifiers. This change may affect how these plugins are resolved and utilized within the build system, but the overall functionality of the build process remains intact.To further improve the management of plugins, consider the following suggestions:
- Document the source and purpose of each plugin, especially if they are custom plugins.
- If the plugins are hosted in a separate repository, ensure that the repository is properly maintained and versioned.
- Consider using a plugin management system, such as the Gradle Plugin Portal, to simplify plugin distribution and consumption.
buildSrc/src/main/kotlin/hu/bsstudio/KotlinConventions.kt (1)
16-21: Review the applied plugins.
The application of the
JavaConventionsplugin looks good.If the commented-out plugins (
KotlinMultiplatformPluginWrapper,SpringGradleSubplugin, andKotlinJpaSubplugin) are not needed, consider removing them to keep the code clean.buildSrc/src/main/kotlin/hu/bsstudio/IntegrationTestingConventions.kt (1)
8-46: TheIntegrationTestingConventionsplugin is referenced but non-functional.The
IntegrationTestingConventionsplugin is being referenced in theintegration/build.gradle.ktsfile, indicating an intention to use it. However, the code for the plugin is currently commented out, rendering it non-functional. Please review and uncomment the necessary code to ensure the plugin is applied correctly.
- File:
buildSrc/src/main/kotlin/hu/bsstudio/IntegrationTestingConventions.kt- Reference:
integration/build.gradle.ktsAnalysis chain
Verify if the commented out code is needed.
The entire
applyfunction is commented out, which means that the plugin is not being applied currently.Please verify if this code is needed. If it's not needed, consider removing it to keep the codebase clean. If it's needed, uncomment the code and ensure that it's working as expected.
To verify if the code is needed, you can search for the usage of this plugin in the codebase using the following script:
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify if the `IntegrationTestingConventions` plugin is being used. # Test: Search for the plugin usage. Expect: No occurrences if the plugin is not being used. rg --type kotlin $'id\\("hu.bsstudio.integration-testing-conventions"\\)'Length of output: 157
buildSrc/src/main/kotlin/hu/bsstudio/TestingConventions.kt (2)
14-86: LGTM with suggestions!The
TestingConventionsclass and theapplymethod are well-structured and correctly configure the testing and code coverage for the project. However, there are a few areas that can be improved:
- The comment at line 23 mentions that Kotlin-related dependencies should be moved to a separate plugin. This can be addressed in a separate PR.
- The excluded packages are hardcoded in the
excludedset. It would be better to make this configurable via an extension or a property.- The required coverage is hardcoded to 100%. It would be better to make this configurable via an extension or a property.
52-71: LGTM with a suggestion!The configuration of the
jacocoTestCoverageVerificationtask is correct and ensures that the excluded packages are not included in the test coverage verification. However, as mentioned earlier, the required coverage is hardcoded to 100% and it would be better to make this configurable via an extension or a property.
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (23)
- .gitignore (1 hunks)
- .idea/kotlinc.xml (1 hunks)
- .sdkmanrc (1 hunks)
- buildSrc/build.gradle.kts (2 hunks)
- buildSrc/src/main/kotlin/hu/bsstudio/DependencyManagement.kt (1 hunks)
- buildSrc/src/main/kotlin/hu/bsstudio/IntegrationTestingConventions.kt (1 hunks)
- buildSrc/src/main/kotlin/hu/bsstudio/JavaConventions.kt (1 hunks)
- buildSrc/src/main/kotlin/hu/bsstudio/KotlinConventions.kt (1 hunks)
- buildSrc/src/main/kotlin/hu/bsstudio/KotlinTestingConventions.kt (1 hunks)
- buildSrc/src/main/kotlin/hu/bsstudio/SpotlessConventions.kt (1 hunks)
- buildSrc/src/main/kotlin/hu/bsstudio/SpringAppConventions.kt (1 hunks)
- buildSrc/src/main/kotlin/hu/bsstudio/SpringModuleConventions.kt (1 hunks)
- buildSrc/src/main/kotlin/hu/bsstudio/TestingConventions.kt (1 hunks)
- client/build.gradle.kts (1 hunks)
- integration/build.gradle.kts (1 hunks)
- server/build.gradle.kts (1 hunks)
- server/client/build.gradle.kts (1 hunks)
- server/common/build.gradle.kts (1 hunks)
- server/data/build.gradle.kts (1 hunks)
- server/model/build.gradle.kts (1 hunks)
- server/operation/build.gradle.kts (1 hunks)
- server/service/build.gradle.kts (1 hunks)
- server/web/build.gradle.kts (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (9)
- .gitignore
- .idea/kotlinc.xml
- .sdkmanrc
- client/build.gradle.kts
- server/common/build.gradle.kts
- server/data/build.gradle.kts
- server/model/build.gradle.kts
- server/operation/build.gradle.kts
- server/service/build.gradle.kts
Additional context used
Learnings (1)
buildSrc/src/main/kotlin/hu/bsstudio/SpotlessConventions.kt (1)
Learnt from: csikb PR: BSStudio/bss-web-admin-backend#305 File: buildSrc/src/main/kotlin/spotless-conventions.gradle.kts:11-14 Timestamp: 2024-03-29T07:46:20.266Z Learning: The `cleanthat()` configuration option is a valid Spotless plugin for Gradle configuration, as documented in the Spotless plugin's GitHub README.
Additional comments not posted (36)
buildSrc/src/main/kotlin/hu/bsstudio/SpringModuleConventions.kt (1)
1-12: LGTM!The code segment defines a Gradle plugin named
SpringModuleConventionsthat applies theDependencyManagementplugin to the project. The code follows the standard structure for defining a Gradle plugin in Kotlin and adheres to the best practices.The purpose of the plugin is clear and it follows a common convention for managing dependencies in a Spring module.
The code changes are approved.
server/client/build.gradle.kts (4)
2-2: LGTM!The change to the
spotless-conventionsplugin identifier is approved.
3-3: LGTM!The change to the
kotlin-conventionsplugin identifier is approved.
4-4: LGTM!The change to the
spring-module-conventionsplugin identifier is approved.
5-5: LGTM!The change to the
kotlin-testing-conventionsplugin identifier is approved.integration/build.gradle.kts (1)
1-13: Request for more information about the motivation behind the changes and their potential impact.The changes involve commenting out the entire block of code related to plugins and dependencies, which may have a significant impact on the project's build process and integration testing capabilities.
Could you please provide more context about the reasons for these changes and how they align with the overall goals of the project? It would be helpful to understand:
- Why are these plugins and dependencies being removed?
- What alternative approaches, if any, are being considered to replace the functionality provided by these plugins and dependencies?
- How will these changes affect the project's build process, code formatting, and integration testing capabilities?
- Have the potential risks and impacts of these changes been fully assessed?
Answering these questions will help ensure that the changes are justified and that the project's build process and testing capabilities are not compromised.
buildSrc/src/main/kotlin/hu/bsstudio/KotlinTestingConventions.kt (1)
1-17: LGTM!The
KotlinTestingConventionsplugin is well-structured and follows Kotlin and Gradle conventions. It applies aTestingConventionsplugin, which promotes code reuse and maintainability. The plugin adds commonly used testing libraries as dependencies, which helps standardize the testing setup across the project. The chosen testing libraries (mockk,springmockk, andkotest) are well-known and widely used in the Kotlin ecosystem. Pinning the specific versions of the dependencies ensures reproducible builds and reduces the risk of unexpected breakages due to version upgrades.The code changes are approved.
server/web/build.gradle.kts (4)
2-2: LGTM!The plugin identifier has been updated to use a namespaced format, which improves the organization and avoids potential naming conflicts.
3-3: LGTM!The plugin identifier has been updated to use a namespaced format, which improves the organization and avoids potential naming conflicts.
4-4: LGTM!The plugin identifier has been updated to use a namespaced format, which improves the organization and avoids potential naming conflicts.
5-5: LGTM!The plugin identifier has been updated to use a namespaced format, which improves the organization and avoids potential naming conflicts.
buildSrc/src/main/kotlin/hu/bsstudio/DependencyManagement.kt (2)
1-5: LGTM!The package declaration and imports are correct and follow the standard conventions.
7-21: LGTM!The
DependencyManagementclass and itsapplymethod are correctly implemented and follow the standard conventions. The class encapsulates the dependency management logic and applies it to the project. The enforced platform versions ensure consistent dependency versions across the project.buildSrc/src/main/kotlin/hu/bsstudio/JavaConventions.kt (4)
1-10: Package declaration and imports look good!The code segment follows the standard conventions.
11-11: Class declaration looks good!The code segment follows the standard conventions.
12-26: Theapplyfunction looks good!The code segment follows the standard conventions and correctly configures the Java conventions for the project.
1-27: TheJavaConventionsplugin looks good!The file is well-structured, follows the standard conventions, and correctly configures the Java conventions for the project.
buildSrc/src/main/kotlin/hu/bsstudio/KotlinConventions.kt (3)
1-13: Package declaration and imports look good!The package name follows the naming conventions, and the imports are relevant to the plugin implementation.
14-15: TheKotlinConventionsclass declaration is correct.The class correctly implements the
Plugin<Project>interface, following the Gradle plugin development conventions.
24-28: The Kotlin compiler configuration is correct.The
-Xjsr305=strictflag enables strict null-safety, which is a good practice for Kotlin projects.buildSrc/src/main/kotlin/hu/bsstudio/SpringAppConventions.kt (4)
1-11: Package declaration and imports look good.The package declaration and imports are necessary for the plugin implementation.
12-13:SpringAppConventionsclass declaration looks good.The class is correctly declared as a Gradle
Pluginthat applies to aProject.
14-20: Verify the purpose and implementation ofSpringModuleConventions.The
applyfunction is correctly applying the necessary plugins. However, it's not clear whatSpringModuleConventionsdoes, as it's not a standard Gradle plugin.Please provide more information about the purpose and implementation of
SpringModuleConventions. If it's a custom plugin, please point to its implementation.
22-33: Task configurations look good.
- Disabling the
Jartask is fine if the project only needs to build bootJars, as mentioned in the comment.- Running
testAggregateTestReportandtestCodeCoverageReporttasks after thetesttask is a good practice to generate test reports and coverage reports.buildSrc/src/main/kotlin/hu/bsstudio/SpotlessConventions.kt (1)
1-42: LGTM!The
SpotlessConventionsplugin is well-structured and correctly applies theSpotlessPluginwith various language-specific formatters. The use ofcleanthat()aligns with the learning from the long-term memory.The code changes are approved.
buildSrc/build.gradle.kts (9)
21-24: LGTM!The
dependencyManagementplugin definition is correctly structured and follows the naming conventions.
25-28: LGTM!The
integrationTestingConventionsplugin definition is correctly structured and follows the naming conventions.
29-32: LGTM!The
javaConventionsplugin definition is correctly structured and follows the naming conventions.
33-36: LGTM!The
kotlinConventionsplugin definition is correctly structured and follows the naming conventions.
37-40: LGTM!The
kotlinTestingConventionsplugin definition is correctly structured and follows the naming conventions.
41-44: LGTM!The
spotlessConventionsplugin definition is correctly structured and follows the naming conventions.
45-48: LGTM!The
springAppConventionsplugin definition is correctly structured and follows the naming conventions.
49-52: LGTM!The
springModuleConventionsplugin definition is correctly structured and follows the naming conventions.
53-56: LGTM!The
testingConventionsplugin definition is correctly structured and follows the naming conventions.buildSrc/src/main/kotlin/hu/bsstudio/TestingConventions.kt (2)
1-13: LGTM!The package declaration and imports are correct and necessary for the plugin.
35-50: LGTM!The configuration of the
jacocoTestReporttask is correct and ensures that the excluded packages are not included in the test report.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (1)
gradle/libs.versions.tomlis excluded by!**/*.toml
Files selected for processing (10)
- buildSrc/build.gradle.kts (3 hunks)
- buildSrc/src/main/kotlin/hu/bsstudio/DependencyManagement.kt (1 hunks)
- buildSrc/src/main/kotlin/hu/bsstudio/IntegrationTestingConventions.kt (1 hunks)
- buildSrc/src/main/kotlin/hu/bsstudio/JavaConventions.kt (1 hunks)
- buildSrc/src/main/kotlin/hu/bsstudio/KotlinConventions.kt (1 hunks)
- buildSrc/src/main/kotlin/hu/bsstudio/KotlinTestingConventions.kt (1 hunks)
- buildSrc/src/main/kotlin/hu/bsstudio/SpotlessConventions.kt (1 hunks)
- buildSrc/src/main/kotlin/hu/bsstudio/SpringAppConventions.kt (1 hunks)
- buildSrc/src/main/kotlin/hu/bsstudio/SpringModuleConventions.kt (1 hunks)
- buildSrc/src/main/kotlin/hu/bsstudio/TestingConventions.kt (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (8)
- buildSrc/src/main/kotlin/hu/bsstudio/DependencyManagement.kt
- buildSrc/src/main/kotlin/hu/bsstudio/IntegrationTestingConventions.kt
- buildSrc/src/main/kotlin/hu/bsstudio/JavaConventions.kt
- buildSrc/src/main/kotlin/hu/bsstudio/KotlinTestingConventions.kt
- buildSrc/src/main/kotlin/hu/bsstudio/SpotlessConventions.kt
- buildSrc/src/main/kotlin/hu/bsstudio/SpringAppConventions.kt
- buildSrc/src/main/kotlin/hu/bsstudio/SpringModuleConventions.kt
- buildSrc/src/main/kotlin/hu/bsstudio/TestingConventions.kt
Additional comments not posted (8)
buildSrc/src/main/kotlin/hu/bsstudio/KotlinConventions.kt (4)
1-9: Package declaration and imports look good!The file is in the correct package and imports commonly used Gradle and Kotlin plugins.
10-10: TheKotlinConventionsclass declaration is correct.It follows the Gradle convention for defining plugins.
Line range hint
19-20: The end of the file is correct.There are no issues with the closing curly braces.
11-18: Verify if all the applied plugins are required for every project.The
applyfunction applies several plugins and conventions:
JavaConventionsKotlinMultiplatformPluginWrapperSpringGradleSubpluginKotlinJpaSubpluginAre all these plugins required for every project that applies
KotlinConventions? If not, consider making some of them optional or moving them to separate convention plugins.To verify if all the applied plugins are used in the projects, run the following script:
If the script output shows that some plugins are not used in any project, consider removing them from
KotlinConventionsor making them optional.buildSrc/build.gradle.kts (4)
3-3: LGTM!The code change is approved.
20-25: LGTM!The code change is approved.
27-64: LGTM!The code change is approved.
Line range hint
1-19: Verify the new dependency management strategy.The
springDependencyManagementdependency has been removed, which indicates a shift in how dependency management is handled within the project.Please ensure that:
- The new dependency management strategy is correctly implemented.
- The removal of the
springDependencyManagementdependency does not break any existing functionality.Run the following script to verify the dependency management:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (10)
- .idea/.gitignore (1 hunks)
- buildSrc/src/main/kotlin/hu/bsstudio/DependencyManagement.kt (1 hunks)
- buildSrc/src/main/kotlin/hu/bsstudio/IntegrationTestingConventions.kt (1 hunks)
- buildSrc/src/main/kotlin/hu/bsstudio/KotlinConventions.kt (1 hunks)
- buildSrc/src/main/kotlin/hu/bsstudio/KotlinTestingConventions.kt (1 hunks)
- buildSrc/src/main/kotlin/hu/bsstudio/SpotlessConventions.kt (1 hunks)
- buildSrc/src/main/kotlin/hu/bsstudio/SpringAppConventions.kt (1 hunks)
- buildSrc/src/main/kotlin/hu/bsstudio/TestingConventions.kt (1 hunks)
- gradle.properties (1 hunks)
- integration/build.gradle.kts (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- .idea/.gitignore
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (7)
- buildSrc/src/main/kotlin/hu/bsstudio/DependencyManagement.kt
- buildSrc/src/main/kotlin/hu/bsstudio/IntegrationTestingConventions.kt
- buildSrc/src/main/kotlin/hu/bsstudio/KotlinTestingConventions.kt
- buildSrc/src/main/kotlin/hu/bsstudio/SpotlessConventions.kt
- buildSrc/src/main/kotlin/hu/bsstudio/SpringAppConventions.kt
- buildSrc/src/main/kotlin/hu/bsstudio/TestingConventions.kt
- integration/build.gradle.kts
Additional comments not posted (2)
gradle.properties (1)
3-3: LGTM! The change to disable "configure on demand" is approved.Setting
org.gradle.configureondemandtofalseensures that all project configurations are up to date, which aligns with the PR objective of refactoring to Binary plugins. This change may lead to longer build times, but it guarantees that all necessary projects are configured correctly.The other properties remain unchanged, indicating that the overall caching, parallel execution, and welcome message settings are still active, which is good.
buildSrc/src/main/kotlin/hu/bsstudio/KotlinConventions.kt (1)
1-26: LGTM!The
KotlinConventionsclass is well-structured and follows the Gradle plugin development conventions. The applied plugins and compiler options are standard for a Kotlin project.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
buildSrc/src/main/kotlin/hu/bsstudio/TestingConventions.kt (1)
1-87: LGTM with minor suggestions!The
TestingConventionsplugin is well-structured and follows Kotlin and Gradle conventions. It effectively configures testing and code coverage for the project.A few suggestions for improvement:
Consider adding more comments to explain the purpose of each configuration. This will make the plugin more maintainable and easier for other developers to understand.
The plugin currently enforces 100% code coverage, which may be too strict for some projects. Consider making the coverage threshold configurable or lowering it to a more realistic value (e.g., 80-90%).
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (16)
- Dockerfile (1 hunks)
- buildSrc/build.gradle.kts (2 hunks)
- buildSrc/src/main/kotlin/hu/bsstudio/DependencyManagement.kt (1 hunks)
- buildSrc/src/main/kotlin/hu/bsstudio/IntegrationTestingConventions.kt (1 hunks)
- buildSrc/src/main/kotlin/hu/bsstudio/SpringAppConventions.kt (1 hunks)
- buildSrc/src/main/kotlin/hu/bsstudio/SpringModuleConventions.kt (1 hunks)
- buildSrc/src/main/kotlin/hu/bsstudio/TestingConventions.kt (1 hunks)
- gradle.properties (0 hunks)
- server/build.gradle.kts (1 hunks)
- server/client/build.gradle.kts (1 hunks)
- server/common/build.gradle.kts (1 hunks)
- server/data/build.gradle.kts (1 hunks)
- server/model/build.gradle.kts (1 hunks)
- server/operation/build.gradle.kts (1 hunks)
- server/service/build.gradle.kts (1 hunks)
- server/web/build.gradle.kts (1 hunks)
Files not reviewed due to no reviewable changes (1)
- gradle.properties
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- server/client/build.gradle.kts
Additional comments not posted (23)
server/common/build.gradle.kts (1)
2-3: LGTM!The changes to the plugin identifiers are consistent with the PR objective of refactoring to Binary plugins. The use of the custom prefix
hu.bsstudiofor the Kotlin and Spring module conventions suggests a shift towards a more tailored set of conventions, while preserving the overall structure and functionality of the build configuration.server/build.gradle.kts (1)
2-3: LGTM!The changes to the plugin identifiers in the
pluginsblock are consistent and align with the PR objective of refactoring to Binary plugins. Prefixing the identifiers withhu.bsstudiosuggests a move towards a more standardized or controlled environment for managing Kotlin and Spring configurations, which is a good practice.The changes do not introduce any issues or errors in the build configuration, and the overall structure of the
pluginsblock remains intact.server/operation/build.gradle.kts (1)
2-4: LGTM!The changes to the plugin identifiers align with the PR objective of refactoring to Binary plugins. Namespacing the plugin identifiers with the prefix
hu.bsstudioimproves the organization and reflects a modular plugin management strategy. The core functionality of the build process remains intact as the plugins are still being applied.buildSrc/src/main/kotlin/hu/bsstudio/SpringModuleConventions.kt (1)
1-12: LGTM!The
SpringModuleConventionsplugin follows Kotlin's coding conventions and Gradle's plugin development practices. It promotes code reuse and modularity by applying two other plugins,DependencyManagementandSpotlessConventions, to the project.Some key points:
- The package declaration and imports are correctly formatted and ordered.
- The class implements the
Plugininterface and overrides theapplymethod.- The naming of the class and parameter is clear and descriptive.
- The indentation and formatting adhere to Kotlin's style guide.
Overall, the code is clean, well-structured, and serves its purpose effectively.
server/service/build.gradle.kts (1)
2-4: LGTM!The changes to the plugin identifiers are consistent and follow a clear pattern of adding the
hu.bsstudioprefix. This refactoring aligns with the PR objective and does not introduce any apparent issues or inconsistencies. The core plugins and the overall build configuration remain intact.server/model/build.gradle.kts (1)
2-4: LGTM!The changes to the plugin identifiers align with the PR objective of refactoring to Binary plugins. The inclusion of the
hu.bsstudionamespace prefix suggests a move towards a more organized approach to plugin management, potentially indicating a shift to a centralized or company-specific repository for these conventions.The changes are consistent across all the plugin declarations, and the core dependencies and structure of the build script remain intact. Therefore, the functionality of the build script is not impacted by these changes.
server/web/build.gradle.kts (3)
4-4: LGTM!The change in the plugin identifier suggests that it is now sourced from or maintained by the "hu.bsstudio" organization. The identifier name remains the same, indicating that the core functionality of the plugin remains intact.
2-2: LGTM! Verify consistent usage of the new plugin identifier.The change in the plugin identifier suggests that it is now sourced from or maintained by the "hu.bsstudio" organization. The core functionality seems to remain intact based on the identifier name.
Please ensure that this change has been consistently applied across the project. You can use the following script to search for any remaining occurrences of the old identifier:
Verification successful
Consistent Usage of New Plugin Identifier Verified
The search results confirm that the old plugin identifier
spotless-conventionshas been consistently replaced withhu.bsstudio.spotless-conventionsacross the project. The change has been applied in the following files:
integration/build.gradle.ktsclient/build.gradle.ktsbuildSrc/build.gradle.ktsScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for any remaining occurrences of the old plugin identifier. # Test: Search for the old identifier. Expect: No results. rg --type kotlin $'spotless-conventions'Length of output: 252
3-3: LGTM! Verify consistent usage of the new plugin identifier.The change in the plugin identifier suggests that it is now sourced from or maintained by the "hu.bsstudio" organization. The new identifier includes "spring-module-conventions", which might indicate additional Spring-related conventions on top of the Kotlin conventions.
Please ensure that this change has been consistently applied across the project. You can use the following script to search for any remaining occurrences of the old identifier:
server/data/build.gradle.kts (3)
3-3: LGTM!The change in the plugin identifier from
spring-module-conventionstohu.bsstudio.spring-module-conventionsis approved.
4-4: LGTM!The change in the plugin identifier from
kotlin-testing-conventionstohu.bsstudio.kotlin-testing-conventionsis approved.
2-2: Verify the impact of the plugin identifier change.The change in the plugin identifier from
spotless-conventionstohu.bsstudio.kotlin-conventionsis approved. However, please ensure that this change does not break the build system or affect other parts of the codebase that may be referencing the old identifier.Run the following script to verify the impact of the change:
buildSrc/src/main/kotlin/hu/bsstudio/DependencyManagement.kt (1)
1-26: LGTM!The
DependencyManagementclass is a well-structured and effective custom Gradle plugin for managing dependencies and conventions in a Kotlin and Spring project. The use ofJavaConventionsandDependencyManagementPluginplugins, along with the addition of themavenCentralrepository and commonly used dependency platforms, ensures consistent conventions and effective dependency management.The code follows best practices and does not have any obvious issues or areas for improvement.
Dockerfile (1)
30-30: LGTM!The change to the
BOOT_JARargument enhances the specificity of the build artifact being utilized by ensuring that only the intended boot JAR file is copied into the container. This change aligns with the best practices of being specific about the artifacts being used in the build process and does not introduce any syntax errors, security vulnerabilities, or performance issues.buildSrc/src/main/kotlin/hu/bsstudio/SpringAppConventions.kt (4)
1-17: LGTM!The package declaration and import statements are correct and relevant to the plugin implementation.
18-25: LGTM!The
SpringAppConventionsclass correctly implements thePlugininterface and applies relevant plugins for a Spring Boot application project in theapplymethod.
27-30: LGTM!Enabling the
BootJartask and setting thearchiveClassifierto"boot"is a good practice for building an executable Spring Boot JAR.
32-43: LGTM!
- Finalizing the test report and code coverage report tasks after the
testtask is a good practice for generating the reports automatically.- The added dependencies are commonly used in Spring Boot projects and serve important purposes.
buildSrc/build.gradle.kts (4)
3-3: LGTM!Adding the Spotless plugin using the
aliasfunction from thelibsplugin is a good practice for managing plugin versions centrally. Spotless is a popular choice for code formatting in Gradle projects.
22-26: LGTM!The Spotless plugin is correctly configured to use Ktlint for Kotlin code formatting. Ktlint is a widely used linter and formatter for Kotlin code, and this configuration follows the standard usage of the Spotless plugin.
28-65: Great work on structuring the Gradle plugins!Defining Gradle plugins in the
buildSrcdirectory is a good practice for encapsulating build logic and conventions. The plugins have clear purposes and follow a consistent naming convention, which enhances the modularity and organization of the build configuration.Some key benefits of this plugin structure:
- Each plugin has a unique ID and implementation class, allowing for better separation of concerns.
- The plugin IDs are namespaced under
hu.bsstudio, which helps avoid naming conflicts with other plugins.- The implementation classes for the plugins suggest their responsibilities, making it easier to understand the purpose of each plugin.
This structure allows for better management of project conventions and dependencies across the codebase.
Line range hint
1-65: Overall, the changes in this file look great!The introduction of the Spotless plugin for code formatting and the definition of several Gradle plugins related to dependency management, testing conventions, and Java/Kotlin/Spring conventions are well-structured and follow best practices.
The changes enhance the modularity and organization of the build configuration, allowing for better management of project conventions and dependencies across the codebase.
No further suggestions or improvements are needed. Great job!
buildSrc/src/main/kotlin/hu/bsstudio/IntegrationTestingConventions.kt (1)
1-62: LGTM!The
IntegrationTestingConventionsplugin is well-implemented and follows best practices. It encapsulates the integration testing setup using Kotest and JUnit, making it reusable across projects. The use of Kotlin DSL makes the code concise and readable.Some key observations:
- The plugin applies the
TestingConventionsplugin and configures theintTestsource set correctly.- It sets up the necessary dependencies for integration testing, excluding Hamcrest and AssertJ to enforce the use of Kotest.
- It defines an
integrationTesttask to run the integration tests and hooks it into thechecktask.Overall, the code is well-structured and follows Kotlin conventions. I don't see any major issues or improvements needed.
|
No description provided.