Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jobs to be treated as legacy unless there is a select statement #51

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

hansrune
Copy link

@hansrune hansrune commented Feb 27, 2023

We think the behaviour of what is regarded a legacy jobs should be changed. That is:

  1. For submit hook: Unless there is a select in resource requirements, the job is held on submit. The submit arguments seem to be unavailable at this point
  2. For periodic hook: Unless there is a select statement in the original submit arguments, the job is a legacy job

The need for this came up as we discovered that quote often, users simply use 'qsub -I -X -q queuename' to allocate a node for testing / interactive use of a GPU etc. In that case the job was not treated as a legacy job, and the needed placement and sharing from the queue defaults did not apply when they should. Result was that multiple users got allocated the same GPU nodes even if the queue defaults had scatter:excl as placement.

@hansrune
Copy link
Author

@microsoft-github-policy-service agree

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant