-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Tracking] Wayfinding and labeling improvements for the Site Editor #68953
Comments
@jordesign What did you have in mind? I'm adding similar issues for Ganon to tackle as part of the Pattern Assembler flow. |
Sharing some context about the wording we use in support pages to see how we can improve it. The labels being used are
Relevant info from support pages
Support pages |
I'm definitely up for discussion on this - but from a user-facing perspective I can imagine options like these to be clearer:
|
The way I've understood, we are moving customers forward to truly do all Site editing in the Site Editor : both content & styles(appearance). So in terms of messaging for the BCPA flow , "Edit Site" makes sense. |
But for other themes, that work in the "traditional" way the messaging should be edit content in the Page Editor. Proceed with caution to this slack thread:9 p1666034981840009-slack-C02M88KJ684 it is loooong. |
With T-Rex taking over part of this issue, let me summarize a little bit looking back at the original request. Providing Better Location AwarenessBetter labelling when landing in the Site Editor to ensure the user is aware of what they are editing. For example:
In some cases, we might need a Core Gutenberg upstream fix. That's ok and encouraged as always! cc @SaxonF for design pointers. Clearer NamingThe original request suggested changing "Edit Site", but I concur with others that we should not change it, as Core is all-in with the "Site Editor" name. I'd also argue that we should not touch the If we want to act upon any of these, I'd recommend waiting to see what Core does once the Site Editor is out of beta. (This said, I don't have a strong opinion on this, so let's talk!) My Home "Edit Homepage" TaskThis is a nasty one with countless combinations, and will need to be properly investigated. Let's start from Autumn's comment above that provides pointers to external resources and conversations about this. |
I think Gutenberg 14.8 has gone some way towards addressing this, it's sometimes much clearer than it was but once you enter "full screen" editor mode there's no improvement. Here's a quick 1 minute tour: ZoNoDx.mp4 |
As discussed in p1675791999480439-slack-C04DZ8M0GHW, that's a good call as default, but what pc4f5j-2wc-p2#theme-activation says is that the "Edit site" wording is particularly confusing after switching to a new theme (it gives users the wrong expectation that they should only edit the content, not the appearance or design of the site). So I opened #73274 to change the CTA's text to "Customize site" which hopefully provides a clearer expectation. |
Finally closing, #71275 was the last remaining task and upstream are going another way. |
What
It would be great to build some better labelling and signposting/wayfinding around pathways and entry points to the Site Editor in order to improve user orientation and context.
Some potential ideas (ref: pc4f5j-2wc-p2#comment-2997 from @pablohoneyhoney ):
I imagine there are other options where we can add further clarity in the pathways to the Site Editor for the user.
Why
Currently we see a lot of confusion from users when entering the Site Editor - not understanding the context that they are editing elements under (within templates). This often results in content which is intended for a single page being added as content to the template (amongst other things).
How
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: