Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use NaN for E_cons instead of missing #136

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 6, 2024
Merged

Conversation

MasanoriKanamaru
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@MasanoriKanamaru MasanoriKanamaru changed the title NaN is used for E_cons instead of missing Use NaN for E_cons instead of missing Apr 5, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 5, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 94.28%. Comparing base (62b829e) to head (ee2084e).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #136   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   94.28%   94.28%           
=======================================
  Files          10       10           
  Lines         683      683           
=======================================
  Hits          644      644           
  Misses         39       39           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Member

@hyrodium hyrodium left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@MasanoriKanamaru MasanoriKanamaru merged commit 7290429 into main Jul 6, 2024
12 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Archived in project
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants