fix: robust way of getting a function signature #24
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
1 task
|
Please update DESCRIPTION and NEWS |
radbasa
approved these changes
Sep 12, 2024
radbasa
deleted the
23-bug-functions-with-long-signatures-break-boxlsp
branch
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Issue #23
Description
Current implementation assumes that the function signature
will always go on one line. As pointed out in #23, this is not
always the case.
To improve the process, I suggest to explicitly extract
function signature by taking "anything that is not the body".
Definition of Done
R CMD check, linter, unit tests, spelling)..Rdfiles withroxygen2::roxygenise())