Update App.test.tsx

[guibranco]

User description

Closes #

📑 Description

✅ Checks

• My pull request adheres to the code style of this project
• My code requires changes to the documentation
• I have updated the documentation as required
• All the tests have passed

☢️ Does this introduce a breaking change?

• Yes
• No

ℹ Additional Information

Note

I'm currently writing a description for your pull request. I should be done shortly (<1 minute). Please don't edit the description field until I'm finished, or we may overwrite each other. If I find nothing to write about, I'll delete this message.

---

Description

• Enhanced test cases for the App component by updating text matching patterns.
• Improved accuracy of the tests by using exact string matches with regex.

---

Changes walkthrough 📝

	Relevant files
Tests	App.test.tsx Enhance test cases for App component                                          test/App.test.tsx Updated regex patterns for text matching in tests. Improved specificity of text queries for better test accuracy. +5/-3

---

💡 Penify usage:
Comment /help on the PR to get a list of all available Penify tools and their descriptions

[code-genius-code-coverage]

The files' contents are under analysis for test generation.

[sourcery-ai]

Reviewer's Guide by Sourcery

This pull request updates the snapshot tests for the App component to reflect changes in the UI. The main changes include updating the header text and adding tests for the project titles displayed in the ProjectGrid component.

No diagrams generated as the changes look simple and do not need a visual representation.

File-Level Changes

Change	Details	Files
Update snapshot tests for App component	Updated the header text matcher in the first test to use a regular expression that matches the beginning and end of the string. Added two new tests to check for the presence of project titles in the ProjectGrid component, using regular expressions for precise matching. Updated the existing test for the ProjectGrid component to check for a different project title, reflecting changes in the UI and ensuring the test remains relevant.	test/App.test.tsx

---

Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

• Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
• Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
• Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
  issue from a review comment by replying to it.
• Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
  request title to generate a title at any time.
• Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
  the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time. You can also use
  this command to specify where the summary should be inserted.

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

• Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
  summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
• Change the review language.
• Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
• Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

• Contact our support team for questions or feedback.
• Visit our documentation for detailed guides and information.
• Keep in touch with the Sourcery team by following us on X/Twitter, LinkedIn or GitHub.

[coderabbitai]

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

---

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[korbit-ai]

I've completed my review and didn't find any issues.

Need a new review? Comment /korbit-review on this PR and I'll review your latest changes.

Korbit Guide: Usage and Customization

Interacting with Korbit

• You can manually ask Korbit to review your PR using the /korbit-review command in a comment at the root of your PR.
• You can ask Korbit to generate a new PR description using the /korbit-generate-pr-description command in any comment on your PR.
• Too many Korbit comments? I can resolve all my comment threads if you use the /korbit-resolve command in any comment on your PR.
• Chat with Korbit on issues we post by tagging @korbit-ai in your reply.
• Help train Korbit to improve your reviews by giving a 👍 or 👎 on the comments Korbit posts.

Customizing Korbit

• Check out our docs on how you can make Korbit work best for you and your team.
• Customize Korbit for your organization through the Korbit Console.

Current Korbit Configuration

General Settings

​

Setting	Value
Review Schedule	Automatic excluding drafts
Max Issue Count	10
Automatic PR Descriptions	✅

Issue Categories

​

Category	Enabled
Naming	✅
Database Operations	✅
Documentation	✅
Logging	✅
Error Handling	✅
Systems and Environment	✅
Objects and Data Structures	✅
Readability and Maintainability	✅
Asynchronous Processing	✅
Design Patterns	✅
Third-Party Libraries	✅
Performance	✅
Security	✅
Functionality	✅

Feedback and Support

• Tell us what you think of Korbit
• Schedule a call with our team
• Email us @ [email protected]

Note

Korbit Pro is free for open source projects 🎉

Looking to add Korbit to your team? Get started with a free 2 week trial here

[penify-dev]

PR Review 🔍

⏱️ Estimated effort to review [1-5]	2, because the changes are straightforward and primarily involve updating text matching patterns in test cases.
🧪 Relevant tests	Yes
⚡ Possible issues	Regex Syntax: The regex pattern in screen.getByText(/^API BR - Catalog^/i) has an incorrect usage of the caret (^) at the end, which may lead to unexpected behavior. It should be removed to match the intended string correctly.
	Regex Syntax: The regex pattern in screen.getByText(/^Vagas Aggregator$/i/) has an extra slash at the end, which is a syntax error. It should be corrected to screen.getByText(/^Vagas Aggregator$/i).
🔒 Security concerns	No

[github-actions]

Infisical secrets check: ✅ No secrets leaked!

💻 Scan logs

12:07AM INF scanning for exposed secrets...
12:07AM INF 70 commits scanned.
12:07AM INF scan completed in 107ms
12:07AM INF no leaks found

[penify-dev]

PR Code Suggestions ✨

Category	Suggestion	Score
Possible bug	Fix the syntax error in the regex pattern for the project title The regex pattern for projectTitleVagasAggregator is incorrectly formatted with an extra slash at the end, which will cause a syntax error. test/App.test.tsx [14] -const projectTitleVagasAggregator = screen.getByText(/^Vagas Aggregator$/i/); +const projectTitleVagasAggregator = screen.getByText(/^Vagas Aggregator$/i); Suggestion importance[1-10]: 9 Why: The suggestion correctly identifies a syntax error in the regex pattern, which would prevent the test from running successfully.	9
Best practice	Define project titles as constants to enhance maintainability It is a good practice to avoid hardcoding strings; consider defining the project titles as constants for better maintainability. test/App.test.tsx [14-17] -const projectTitleVagasAggregator = screen.getByText(/^Vagas Aggregator$/i); -const projectTitleSportsAgenda = screen.getByText(/^Sports Agenda$/i); +const PROJECT_TITLE_VAGAS_AGGREGATOR = /^Vagas Aggregator$/i; +const PROJECT_TITLE_SPORTS_AGENDA = /^Sports Agenda$/i; +const projectTitleVagasAggregator = screen.getByText(PROJECT_TITLE_VAGAS_AGGREGATOR); +const projectTitleSportsAgenda = screen.getByText(PROJECT_TITLE_SPORTS_AGENDA); Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7 Why: This suggestion promotes better maintainability by avoiding hardcoded strings, but it is not critical to the functionality of the tests.	7
Maintainability	Improve the clarity of the test case name for better understanding Consider using a more descriptive test name for the second test case to clarify what the test is verifying. test/App.test.tsx [12] -it('renders the ProjectGrid component with projects', () => { +it('renders the ProjectGrid component with specific project titles', () => { Suggestion importance[1-10]: 6 Why: While improving test case names is beneficial for clarity, the original name is still reasonably descriptive, making this a minor improvement.	6
Performance	Reduce code duplication by using a beforeEach block for common setup steps Ensure that the tests are wrapped in a beforeEach block if there are common setup steps, like rendering the App component, to avoid repetition. test/App.test.tsx [7] -render(<App />); +beforeEach(() => { + render(<App />); +}); Suggestion importance[1-10]: 5 Why: While using beforeEach can reduce duplication, the current setup is still clear and functional, making this suggestion less impactful.	5

[sourcery-ai]

Hey @guibranco - I've reviewed your changes - here's some feedback:

Overall Comments:

• Please add a description explaining the motivation for the regex pattern changes and additional test case. This helps future maintainers understand why these changes were made.

Here's what I looked at during the review

• 🟢 General issues: all looks good
• 🟢 Security: all looks good
• 🟡 Testing: 1 issue found
• 🟢 Complexity: all looks good
• 🟢 Documentation: all looks good

---

Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨

• X
• Mastodon
• LinkedIn
• Facebook

_{Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.}

[sourcery-ai]

issue (testing): Incorrect regex usage in header test.

The ^ characters inside the regex string are treated literally, not as start/end anchors. This test will fail if the header text contains any extra characters or whitespace around "API BR - Catalog". Consider using screen.getByRole('heading', { name: /API BR - Catalog/i }) for more robust header testing or fixing the regex to /^API BR - Catalog$/i.