Create .htaccess #69
Create .htaccess #69
Conversation
|
The files' contents are under analysis for test generation. |
Reviewer's Guide by SourceryThis pull request introduces a new No diagrams generated as the changes look simple and do not need a visual representation. File-Level Changes
Tips and commandsInteracting with Sourcery
Customizing Your ExperienceAccess your dashboard to:
Getting Help
|
gstraccini
bot
added
the
☑️ auto-merge
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces a new Changes
Suggested Labels
Suggested Reviewers
Poem
🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![gstraccini[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/480132?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
github-actions
bot
added
the
size/XS
![sourcery-ai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/48477?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hey @guibranco - I've reviewed your changes - here's some feedback:
Overall Comments:
- Please provide a description of why this .htaccess file is needed and what rules you plan to add. Currently, the file is empty and the PR description doesn't explain its purpose. Consider resubmitting once you have actual content to add and can fill out the PR template with relevant information.
Here's what I looked at during the review
- 🟢 General issues: all looks good
- 🟢 Security: all looks good
- 🟢 Testing: all looks good
- 🟢 Complexity: all looks good
- 🟢 Documentation: all looks good
Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.
PR Review 🔍
|
![korbit-ai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/322216?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I've completed my review and didn't find any issues.
Need a new review? Comment
/korbit-reviewon this PR and I'll review your latest changes.Korbit Guide: Usage and Customization
Interacting with Korbit
- You can manually ask Korbit to review your PR using the
/korbit-reviewcommand in a comment at the root of your PR.- You can ask Korbit to generate a new PR description using the
/korbit-generate-pr-descriptioncommand in any comment on your PR.- Too many Korbit comments? I can resolve all my comment threads if you use the
/korbit-resolvecommand in any comment on your PR.- Chat with Korbit on issues we post by tagging @korbit-ai in your reply.
- Help train Korbit to improve your reviews by giving a 👍 or 👎 on the comments Korbit posts.
Customizing Korbit
- Check out our docs on how you can make Korbit work best for you and your team.
- Customize Korbit for your organization through the Korbit Console.
Current Korbit Configuration
General Settings
Setting Value Review Schedule Automatic excluding drafts Max Issue Count 10 Automatic PR Descriptions ✅ Issue Categories
Category Enabled Naming ✅ Database Operations ✅ Documentation ✅ Logging ✅ Error Handling ✅ Systems and Environment ✅ Objects and Data Structures ✅ Readability and Maintainability ✅ Asynchronous Processing ✅ Design Patterns ✅ Third-Party Libraries ✅ Performance ✅ Security ✅ Functionality ✅ Feedback and Support
Note
Korbit Pro is free for open source projects 🎉
Looking to add Korbit to your team? Get started with a free 2 week trial here
PR Code Suggestions ✨
|
|
Infisical secrets check: ✅ No secrets leaked! 💻 Scan logs11:39PM INF scanning for exposed secrets...
11:39PM INF 59 commits scanned.
11:39PM INF scan completed in 97.7ms
11:39PM INF no leaks found
|
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
public/.htaccess (1)
6-7: Forcing a single domain is clear, but consider preserving subdomains if needed.This second condition ensures that all requests not matching
apibr.comare redirected to the apex domain. If your project needs subdomains—likewww.apibr.comor.apibr.com—they would be stripped out. If that’s intentional, this is fine. Otherwise, consider adjusting the regex to capture subdomains or route them appropriately.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
public/.htaccess(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
public/.htaccess (2)
1-1: This is a good start to ensure mod_rewrite is enabled.
Enabling the rewrite engine with RewriteEngine On is necessary for subsequent rewrite rules to work properly. This is correct usage.
3-4: Good HTTPS enforcement, but verify reverse proxy settings if applicable.
The condition RewriteCond %{HTTPS} off followed by a redirect to https://%{HTTP_HOST}%{REQUEST_URI} is a standard approach for enforcing HTTPS. However, if the application is behind a reverse proxy or load balancer, you may need to ensure that the off condition correctly reflects the actual transport layer rather than just the internal server state. In some setups, %{HTTP:X-Forwarded-Proto} might be a more reliable header to check.
User description
Closes #
📑 Description
✅ Checks
☢️ Does this introduce a breaking change?
ℹ Additional Information
Note
I'm currently writing a description for your pull request. I should be done shortly (<1 minute). Please don't edit the description field until I'm finished, or we may overwrite each other. If I find nothing to write about, I'll delete this message.
Description
.htaccessfile to manage URL redirection.https://apibr.comfor all hosts exceptapibr.com.Changes walkthrough 📝
.htaccess
Implement HTTPS and domain redirection in .htaccesspublic/.htaccess
https://apibr.comunless the host is alreadyapibr.com.Summary by CodeRabbit