-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. Weβll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update deploy.yml #67
Conversation
The files' contents are under analysis for test generation. |
Reviewer's Guide by SourceryThis pull request re-enables the automatic upload of the build to the FTP server after the tests pass. Sequence diagram for the updated deployment workflowsequenceDiagram
participant GH as GitHub Actions
participant Tests as Test Suite
participant FTP as FTP Server
GH->>Tests: Run npm test
Tests-->>GH: Tests complete
GH->>FTP: Upload build artifacts
Note right of FTP: Upload dist/ directory
FTP-->>GH: Upload complete
File-Level Changes
Tips and commandsInteracting with Sourcery
Customizing Your ExperienceAccess your dashboard to:
Getting Help
|
WalkthroughThe pull request modifies the GitHub Actions workflow file Changes
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Possibly related PRs
Poem
π Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI π Files selected for processing (1)
π§ Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
πͺ§ TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I've completed my review and didn't find any issues.
Need a new review? Comment
/korbit-review
on this PR and I'll review your latest changes.Korbit Guide: Usage and Customization
Interacting with Korbit
- You can manually ask Korbit to review your PR using the
/korbit-review
command in a comment at the root of your PR.- You can ask Korbit to generate a new PR description using the
/korbit-generate-pr-description
command in any comment on your PR.- Too many Korbit comments? I can resolve all my comment threads if you use the
/korbit-resolve
command in any comment on your PR.- Chat with Korbit on issues we post by tagging @korbit-ai in your reply.
- Help train Korbit to improve your reviews by giving a π or π on the comments Korbit posts.
Customizing Korbit
- Check out our docs on how you can make Korbit work best for you and your team.
- Customize Korbit for your organization through the Korbit Console.
Current Korbit Configuration
General Settings
β
Setting Value Review Schedule Automatic excluding drafts Max Issue Count 10 Automatic PR Descriptions β Issue Categories
β
Category Enabled Naming β Database Operations β Documentation β Logging β Error Handling β Systems and Environment β Objects and Data Structures β Readability and Maintainability β Asynchronous Processing β Design Patterns β Third-Party Libraries β Performance β Security β Functionality β Feedback and Support
Note
Korbit Pro is free for open source projects π
Looking to add Korbit to your team? Get started with a free 2 week trial here
PR Review π
|
PR Code Suggestions β¨
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hey @guibranco - I've reviewed your changes and found some issues that need to be addressed.
Blocking issues:
- Using plain FTP for deployment poses significant security risks as credentials and data are transmitted in plaintext (link)
Overall Comments:
- Consider using FTPS or SFTP instead of plain FTP for more secure deployments. Plain FTP transmits credentials and data unencrypted.
- Deploying to the root directory ('/') could be risky. Consider using a specific subdirectory for deployments to limit potential damage from deployment issues.
Here's what I looked at during the review
- π’ General issues: all looks good
- π΄ Security: 1 blocking issue
- π’ Testing: all looks good
- π’ Complexity: all looks good
- π’ Documentation: all looks good
Help me be more useful! Please click π or π on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 2
π§Ή Nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/deploy.yml (1)
Line range hint
3-6
: Improve deployment workflow safetyThe current workflow configuration has several potential risks:
- Automatic deployment to production on every push to main
- No environment protection rules
- Deploying to root directory (
/
) which could accidentally overwrite filesConsider these improvements:
- Add environment protection rules:
jobs: build: environment: production # ... existing configuration
- Use a specific subdirectory for deployment:
- remoteDir: "/" + remoteDir: "/www" # or another appropriate subdirectory
- Add manual approval for production deployments by configuring environment protection rules in repository settings.
Also applies to: 56-57
π§° Tools
πͺ yamllint (1.35.1)
[error] 50-50: syntax error: expected , but found '-'
(syntax)
π Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
π Files selected for processing (1)
.github/workflows/deploy.yml
(1 hunks)
π§° Additional context used
πͺ yamllint (1.35.1)
.github/workflows/deploy.yml
[error] 50-50: syntax error: expected , but found '-'
(syntax)
Infisical secrets check: β No secrets leaked! π» Scan logs11:37PM INF scanning for exposed secrets...
11:37PM INF 59 commits scanned.
11:37PM INF scan completed in 100ms
11:37PM INF no leaks found
|
Quality Gate passedIssues Measures |
User description
Closes #
π Description
β Checks
β’οΈ Does this introduce a breaking change?
βΉ Additional Information
Note
I'm currently writing a description for your pull request. I should be done shortly (<1 minute). Please don't edit the description field until I'm finished, or we may overwrite each other. If I find nothing to write about, I'll delete this message.
Description
Changes walkthrough π
deploy.yml
Enable FTP Upload in Deployment Workflow
Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β.github/workflows/deploy.yml
Summary by CodeRabbit