Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update deploy.yml #67

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Dec 28, 2024
Merged

Update deploy.yml #67

merged 3 commits into from
Dec 28, 2024

Conversation

guibranco
Copy link
Member

@guibranco guibranco commented Dec 28, 2024

User description

Closes #

πŸ“‘ Description

βœ… Checks

  • My pull request adheres to the code style of this project
  • My code requires changes to the documentation
  • I have updated the documentation as required
  • All the tests have passed

☒️ Does this introduce a breaking change?

  • Yes
  • No

β„Ή Additional Information

Note

I'm currently writing a description for your pull request. I should be done shortly (<1 minute). Please don't edit the description field until I'm finished, or we may overwrite each other. If I find nothing to write about, I'll delete this message.


Description

  • Re-enabled the upload build step to allow deployment of build artifacts.
  • Configured the FTP action with necessary credentials and directories.

Changes walkthrough πŸ“

Relevant files
Enhancement
deploy.yml
Enable FTP Upload in Deployment WorkflowΒ  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β 

.github/workflows/deploy.yml

  • Re-enabled the upload build step in the deployment workflow.
  • Configured FTP action to upload the build artifacts to the server.
  • +8/-8Β  Β  Β 

    πŸ’‘ Penify usage:
    Comment /help on the PR to get a list of all available Penify tools and their descriptions

    Summary by CodeRabbit

    • Chores
      • Updated GitHub Actions workflow to enable automatic deployment of build artifacts via FTP
      • Activated previously commented-out deployment step for build uploads

    Copy link

    The files' contents are under analysis for test generation.

    Copy link
    Contributor

    sourcery-ai bot commented Dec 28, 2024

    Reviewer's Guide by Sourcery

    This pull request re-enables the automatic upload of the build to the FTP server after the tests pass.

    Sequence diagram for the updated deployment workflow

    sequenceDiagram
        participant GH as GitHub Actions
        participant Tests as Test Suite
        participant FTP as FTP Server
    
        GH->>Tests: Run npm test
        Tests-->>GH: Tests complete
        GH->>FTP: Upload build artifacts
        Note right of FTP: Upload dist/ directory
        FTP-->>GH: Upload complete
    
    Loading

    File-Level Changes

    Change Details Files
    The workflow now uploads the build to the FTP server.
    • Uncommented lines that upload the build to the FTP server using sebastianpopp/ftp-action@releases/v2.
    • Removed the lines that were previously used to upload the build.
    .github/workflows/deploy.yml

    Tips and commands

    Interacting with Sourcery

    • Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
    • Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
    • Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
      issue from a review comment by replying to it.
    • Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
      request title to generate a title at any time.
    • Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
      the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time. You can also use
      this command to specify where the summary should be inserted.

    Customizing Your Experience

    Access your dashboard to:

    • Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
      summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
    • Change the review language.
    • Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
    • Adjust other review settings.

    Getting Help

    @guibranco guibranco enabled auto-merge (squash) December 28, 2024 23:33
    @gstraccini gstraccini bot added the β˜‘οΈ auto-merge Automatic merging of pull requests (gstraccini-bot) label Dec 28, 2024
    Copy link

    coderabbitai bot commented Dec 28, 2024

    Walkthrough

    The pull request modifies the GitHub Actions workflow file .github/workflows/deploy.yml by uncommenting the "Upload build" step. This step uses the sebastianpopp/ftp-action@releases/v2 action to upload build artifacts from the dist/ local directory to the root (/) of an FTP server. The change enables automatic FTP deployment of build artifacts after the build process, which was previously disabled.

    Changes

    File Change Summary
    .github/workflows/deploy.yml Uncommented FTP upload step to enable automatic deployment of build artifacts

    Suggested labels

    size/XS, Review effort [1-5]: 1

    Suggested reviewers

    • gstraccini

    Possibly related PRs

    • Update deploy.ymlΒ #66: This PR also modifies the .github/workflows/deploy.yml file, specifically related to the FTP upload step, indicating a direct connection to the changes made in the main PR.

    Poem

    🐰 A rabbit's deploy delight,
    FTP upload now shines so bright!
    Artifacts flying through the air,
    From dist/ to server with flair,
    Workflow magic takes its flight! πŸš€


    πŸ“œ Recent review details

    Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
    Review profile: CHILL
    Plan: Pro

    πŸ“₯ Commits

    Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between c58842e and 7d6ce82.

    πŸ“’ Files selected for processing (1)
    • .github/workflows/deploy.yml (1 hunks)
    🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
    • .github/workflows/deploy.yml

    πŸͺ§ Tips

    Chat

    There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

    • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
      • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
      • Generate unit testing code for this file.
      • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
    • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
      • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
      • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
    • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
      • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
      • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
      • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
      • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

    Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

    CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

    • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
    • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
    • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
    • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
    • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
    • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
    • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
    • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
    • @coderabbitai help to get help.

    Other keywords and placeholders

    • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
    • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
    • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

    CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

    • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
    • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
    • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

    Documentation and Community

    • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
    • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
    • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

    @penify-dev penify-dev bot added the enhancement New feature or request label Dec 28, 2024
    @github-actions github-actions bot added the size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. label Dec 28, 2024
    Copy link

    @korbit-ai korbit-ai bot left a comment

    Choose a reason for hiding this comment

    The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

    I've completed my review and didn't find any issues.

    Need a new review? Comment /korbit-review on this PR and I'll review your latest changes.

    Korbit Guide: Usage and Customization

    Interacting with Korbit

    • You can manually ask Korbit to review your PR using the /korbit-review command in a comment at the root of your PR.
    • You can ask Korbit to generate a new PR description using the /korbit-generate-pr-description command in any comment on your PR.
    • Too many Korbit comments? I can resolve all my comment threads if you use the /korbit-resolve command in any comment on your PR.
    • Chat with Korbit on issues we post by tagging @korbit-ai in your reply.
    • Help train Korbit to improve your reviews by giving a πŸ‘ or πŸ‘Ž on the comments Korbit posts.

    Customizing Korbit

    • Check out our docs on how you can make Korbit work best for you and your team.
    • Customize Korbit for your organization through the Korbit Console.

    Current Korbit Configuration

    General Settings ​
    Setting Value
    Review Schedule Automatic excluding drafts
    Max Issue Count 10
    Automatic PR Descriptions βœ…
    Issue Categories ​
    Category Enabled
    Naming βœ…
    Database Operations βœ…
    Documentation βœ…
    Logging βœ…
    Error Handling βœ…
    Systems and Environment βœ…
    Objects and Data Structures βœ…
    Readability and Maintainability βœ…
    Asynchronous Processing βœ…
    Design Patterns βœ…
    Third-Party Libraries βœ…
    Performance βœ…
    Security βœ…
    Functionality βœ…

    Feedback and Support

    Note

    Korbit Pro is free for open source projects πŸŽ‰

    Looking to add Korbit to your team? Get started with a free 2 week trial here

    Copy link
    Contributor

    penify-dev bot commented Dec 28, 2024

    PR Review πŸ”

    ⏱️ Estimated effort to review [1-5]

    2, because the changes are straightforward and primarily involve re-enabling a previously commented-out section of the workflow file.

    πŸ§ͺΒ Relevant tests

    No

    ⚑ Possible issues

    No

    πŸ”’Β Security concerns

    No

    Copy link
    Contributor

    penify-dev bot commented Dec 28, 2024

    PR Code Suggestions ✨

    CategorySuggestionΒ  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Score
    Security
    Improve security by using environment variables for sensitive information

    Consider using a more secure method for handling sensitive information, such as using
    environment variables instead of secrets directly in the workflow.

    .github/workflows/deploy.yml [53-55]

    -host: ${{ secrets.FTP_SERVER }}
    -user: ${{ secrets.FTP_USERNAME }}
    -password: ${{ secrets.FTP_PASSWORD }}
    +host: ${{ env.FTP_SERVER }}
    +user: ${{ env.FTP_USERNAME }}
    +password: ${{ env.FTP_PASSWORD }}
     
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8

    Why: While using secrets is generally secure, switching to environment variables can provide better flexibility and security practices in CI/CD workflows.

    8
    Enhancement
    Add error handling to the upload step to manage potential failures

    Consider adding error handling or notifications in case the upload fails to ensure that
    deployment issues are addressed promptly.

    .github/workflows/deploy.yml [50]

     - name: Upload build
    +  continue-on-error: true
     
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7

    Why: Adding error handling is a good practice to improve the robustness of the deployment process, though it is not critical for the initial implementation.

    7
    Best practice
    Update the action to use the latest version for improved security and features

    Review the version of the ftp-action being used to ensure it is the latest and includes
    any security patches or improvements.

    .github/workflows/deploy.yml [51]

    -uses: sebastianpopp/ftp-action@releases/v2
    +uses: sebastianpopp/ftp-action@latest
     
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 6

    Why: Updating to the latest version is a good practice for security and features, but the current version may still be adequate depending on the context of the project.

    6
    Possible issue
    Validate and specify the correct paths for local and remote directories

    Ensure that the localDir and remoteDir paths are correctly set and validated to prevent
    potential deployment issues.

    .github/workflows/deploy.yml [56-57]

     localDir: "dist/"
    -remoteDir: "/"
    +remoteDir: "/path/to/remote/dir"
     
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 5

    Why: The suggestion to validate paths is reasonable, but the current paths appear to be standard and functional, making this a minor concern.

    5

    Copy link
    Contributor

    @sourcery-ai sourcery-ai bot left a comment

    Choose a reason for hiding this comment

    The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

    Hey @guibranco - I've reviewed your changes and found some issues that need to be addressed.

    Blocking issues:

    • Using plain FTP for deployment poses significant security risks as credentials and data are transmitted in plaintext (link)

    Overall Comments:

    • Consider using FTPS or SFTP instead of plain FTP for more secure deployments. Plain FTP transmits credentials and data unencrypted.
    • Deploying to the root directory ('/') could be risky. Consider using a specific subdirectory for deployments to limit potential damage from deployment issues.
    Here's what I looked at during the review
    • 🟒 General issues: all looks good
    • πŸ”΄ Security: 1 blocking issue
    • 🟒 Testing: all looks good
    • 🟒 Complexity: all looks good
    • 🟒 Documentation: all looks good

    Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨
    Help me be more useful! Please click πŸ‘ or πŸ‘Ž on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.

    .github/workflows/deploy.yml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
    Copy link

    @coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

    Choose a reason for hiding this comment

    The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

    Actionable comments posted: 2

    🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
    .github/workflows/deploy.yml (1)

    Line range hint 3-6: Improve deployment workflow safety

    The current workflow configuration has several potential risks:

    1. Automatic deployment to production on every push to main
    2. No environment protection rules
    3. Deploying to root directory (/) which could accidentally overwrite files

    Consider these improvements:

    1. Add environment protection rules:
    jobs:
      build:
        environment: production
        # ... existing configuration
    1. Use a specific subdirectory for deployment:
    -        remoteDir: "/"
    +        remoteDir: "/www" # or another appropriate subdirectory
    1. Add manual approval for production deployments by configuring environment protection rules in repository settings.

    Also applies to: 56-57

    🧰 Tools
    πŸͺ› yamllint (1.35.1)

    [error] 50-50: syntax error: expected , but found '-'

    (syntax)

    πŸ“œ Review details

    Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
    Review profile: CHILL
    Plan: Pro

    πŸ“₯ Commits

    Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 94f5889 and c58842e.

    πŸ“’ Files selected for processing (1)
    • .github/workflows/deploy.yml (1 hunks)
    🧰 Additional context used
    πŸͺ› yamllint (1.35.1)
    .github/workflows/deploy.yml

    [error] 50-50: syntax error: expected , but found '-'

    (syntax)

    .github/workflows/deploy.yml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
    .github/workflows/deploy.yml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
    Copy link

    Infisical secrets check: βœ… No secrets leaked!

    πŸ’» Scan logs
    11:37PM INF scanning for exposed secrets...
    11:37PM INF 59 commits scanned.
    11:37PM INF scan completed in 100ms
    11:37PM INF no leaks found
    

    @guibranco guibranco merged commit 294f94e into main Dec 28, 2024
    19 checks passed
    @guibranco guibranco deleted the guibranco-patch-1 branch December 28, 2024 23:39
    Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
    Labels
    β˜‘οΈ auto-merge Automatic merging of pull requests (gstraccini-bot) enhancement New feature or request Review effort [1-5]: 2 size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.
    Projects
    None yet
    Development

    Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

    1 participant