Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature/add tests #6

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Nov 22, 2024
Merged

Feature/add tests #6

merged 5 commits into from
Nov 22, 2024

Conversation

guibranco
Copy link
Member

@guibranco guibranco commented Nov 22, 2024

User description

📑 Description

Add tests to the components

✅ Checks

  • My pull request adheres to the code style of this project
  • My code requires changes to the documentation
  • I have updated the documentation as required
  • All the tests have passed

☢️ Does this introduce a breaking change?

  • Yes
  • No

Description

  • Introduced unit tests for various components including ProjectCard, ProjectGrid, Footer, Header, and App.
  • Enhanced Vite configuration to support testing and coverage reporting.
  • Updated package.json to include new testing scripts and dependencies.
  • Added setup for testing library to ensure proper testing environment.

Changes walkthrough 📝

Relevant files
Tests
ProjectCard.test.tsx
Unit tests for ProjectCard component                                         

src/components/ProjectCard.test.tsx

  • Added unit tests for ProjectCard component.
  • Verified rendering of project title, image, and links.
  • Checked hover styles functionality.
  • +66/-0   
    ProjectGrid.test.tsx
    Unit tests for ProjectGrid component                                         

    src/components/ProjectGrid.test.tsx

  • Added tests for ProjectGrid component.
  • Verified rendering of project cards and grid styles.
  • +43/-0   
    Footer.test.tsx
    Unit tests for Footer component                                                   

    src/components/Footer.test.tsx

  • Added tests for Footer component.
  • Verified rendering of developer information and GitHub link.
  • +30/-0   
    App.test.tsx
    Unit tests for App component                                                         

    src/App.test.tsx

  • Added tests for App component.
  • Verified rendering of Header, ProjectGrid, and Footer components.
  • +23/-0   
    Header.test.tsx
    Unit tests for Header component                                                   

    src/components/Header.test.tsx

  • Added tests for Header component.
  • Verified rendering of logo and title.
  • +10/-0   
    Enhancement
    setupTests.ts
    Setup for testing library                                                               

    src/setupTests.ts

    • Added setup file for testing library.
    +1/-0     
    vite.config.ts
    Vite configuration updates for testing                                     

    vite.config.ts

  • Updated Vite configuration for testing.
  • Added coverage reporting settings.
  • +11/-3   
    package.json
    Update testing scripts and dependencies                                   

    package.json

  • Added testing and coverage scripts.
  • Updated testing dependencies.
  • +12/-3   

    💡 Penify usage:
    Comment /help on the PR to get a list of all available Penify tools and their descriptions

    Summary by CodeRabbit

    Release Notes

    • New Features

      • Enhanced testing capabilities with the integration of Vitest and related libraries.
      • New test suites added for the App, Header, Footer, ProjectCard, and ProjectGrid components.
    • Bug Fixes

      • Updated hover effect for the ProjectCard component to improve visual feedback.
      • Translated footer text from "Desenvolvido por" to "Developed by".
    • Documentation

      • Improved testing setup with additional matchers from @testing-library/jest-dom.
    • Chores

      • Updated .gitignore to exclude coverage results.
      • Modified vite.config.ts to include test configuration settings.

    Copy link

    The files' contents are under analysis for test generation.

    Copy link

    coderabbitai bot commented Nov 22, 2024

    Caution

    Review failed

    The pull request is closed.

    Walkthrough

    The changes in this pull request include updates to the .gitignore file to ignore coverage results, modifications to the package.json file to add new testing scripts and dependencies, and the introduction of several test files for various components using the React Testing Library and Vitest. Additionally, changes were made to the Footer and ProjectGrid components, including text translation and modifications to hover effects. The Vite configuration was also updated to include a test configuration for improved testing capabilities.

    Changes

    File Change Summary
    .gitignore Added entry /coverage/** to ignore coverage results.
    package.json Added scripts for testing: "test": "vitest", "test:watch": "vitest --watch", "test:coverage": "vitest --coverage". Added new dependencies and updated existing ones.
    src/App.test.tsx Introduced a test suite for the App component with tests for Header, ProjectGrid, and Footer.
    src/components/Footer.test.tsx Added test suite for Footer component with three test cases verifying rendering and links.
    src/components/Footer.tsx Translated text from "Desenvolvido por" to "Developed by".
    src/components/Header.test.tsx Introduced a test file for the Header component with a test case for rendering.
    src/components/ProjectCard.test.tsx Added a test suite for the ProjectCard component with multiple test cases for rendering and hover effects.
    src/components/ProjectCard.tsx Modified hover effect in Card component and added data-testid attribute for testing purposes.
    src/components/ProjectGrid.test.tsx Introduced a test file for the ProjectGrid component with tests for rendering and styling.
    src/components/ProjectGrid.tsx Added data-testid attribute to the Grid component for improved testability.
    src/main.test.jsx Introduced a test file for the App component with a test case for rendering.
    src/setupTests.ts Added import for @testing-library/jest-dom to enhance testing capabilities.
    vite.config.ts Added test configuration object to Vite setup, specifying testing environment and coverage reporting options.

    Sequence Diagram(s)

    sequenceDiagram
        participant User
        participant App
        participant Header
        participant ProjectGrid
        participant Footer
    
        User->>App: Render App component
        App->>Header: Render Header
        App->>ProjectGrid: Render ProjectGrid
        App->>Footer: Render Footer
        Header-->>User: Display Header content
        ProjectGrid-->>User: Display Project Cards
        Footer-->>User: Display Footer content
    
    Loading

    🐰 "In the code, there’s a new way,
    To test our apps and play all day.
    With scripts and tests, we hop with glee,
    Coverage ignored, as happy as can be!
    So let’s rejoice, with a joyful cheer,
    For changes made, we hold so dear!" 🐇✨

    Warning

    Rate limit exceeded

    @penify-dev[bot] has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 28 minutes and 9 seconds before requesting another review.

    ⌛ How to resolve this issue?

    After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

    We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

    🚦 How do rate limits work?

    CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

    Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

    Please see our FAQ for further information.

    📥 Commits

    Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5c34e45 and acf856a.


    Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

    ❤️ Share
    🪧 Tips

    Chat

    There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

    • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
      • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
      • Generate unit testing code for this file.
      • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
    • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
      • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
      • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
    • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
      • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
      • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
      • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
      • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

    Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

    CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

    • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
    • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
    • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
    • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
    • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
    • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
    • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
    • @coderabbitai help to get help.

    Other keywords and placeholders

    • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
    • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
    • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

    CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

    • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
    • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
    • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

    Documentation and Community

    • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
    • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
    • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

    @guibranco guibranco enabled auto-merge (squash) November 22, 2024 02:26
    @gstraccini gstraccini bot added the ☑️ auto-merge Automatic merging of pull requests (gstraccini-bot) label Nov 22, 2024
    @guibranco guibranco merged commit 4d238b6 into main Nov 22, 2024
    7 of 10 checks passed
    @guibranco guibranco deleted the feature/add-tests branch November 22, 2024 02:26
    Copy link
    Contributor

    penify-dev bot commented Nov 22, 2024

    PR Review 🔍

    ⏱️ Estimated effort to review [1-5]

    4, because the PR introduces a significant number of new tests across multiple components, along with changes to the configuration and package files. The review will require careful examination of both the test logic and the modifications to ensure everything is functioning as intended.

    🧪 Relevant tests

    Yes

    ⚡ Possible issues

    Breaking Change: The hover styles for the ProjectCard component have been modified, which may affect existing functionality if not accounted for in other parts of the application.

    🔒 Security concerns

    No

    Copy link
    Contributor

    penify-dev bot commented Nov 22, 2024

    PR Code Suggestions ✨

    CategorySuggestion                                                                                                                                    Score
    Possible issue
    Verify that each rendered ProjectCard receives the correct props during testing

    Ensure that the ProjectCard components are rendered with the correct props by checking the
    slug and apiVersion for each card.

    src/components/ProjectGrid.test.tsx [22]

    -expect(projectCards.length).toBe(mockProjects.length);
    +mockProjects.forEach((project, index) => {
    +  expect(projectCards[index]).toHaveTextContent(project.title);
    +  expect(projectCards[index]).toHaveAttribute('slug', project.slug);
    +  expect(projectCards[index]).toHaveAttribute('apiVersion', project.apiVersion.toString());
    +});
     
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8

    Why: This suggestion is significant as it ensures that the rendered components receive the correct props, which is crucial for the integrity of the tests.

    8
    Validate that the image source is correctly rendered in the test

    Ensure that the imageElement in the test for the project image is actually rendered by
    checking if the src attribute matches the expected value.

    src/components/ProjectCard.test.tsx [20-24]

     expect(imageElement).toBeInTheDocument();
    -expect(imageElement).toHaveAttribute(
    -  "src",
    -  `project-images/${mockProject.slug}.png`
    -);
    +expect(imageElement).toHaveAttribute("src", `project-images/${mockProject.slug}.png`);
    +expect(imageElement.src).toContain(`project-images/${mockProject.slug}.png`);
     
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7

    Why: The suggestion improves the test by validating that the image source is correctly rendered, which is important for ensuring the component behaves as expected.

    7
    Adjust the index used to access the GitHub link to ensure it points to the correct element

    In the test for the GitHub repository link, ensure that the correct index is used when
    accessing the link to avoid potential errors if the structure changes.

    src/components/Footer.test.tsx [16]

    -const githubLink = screen.getAllByText('GitHub')[1].closest('a');
    +const githubLink = screen.getAllByText('GitHub')[0].closest('a');
     
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 5

    Why: While this suggestion aims to improve the robustness of the test, changing the index may not guarantee correctness if the structure of the component changes, making it a minor improvement.

    5
    Maintainability
    Prevent variable shadowing by renaming the inner variable in the hover styles test

    In the hover styles test, avoid redefining cardElement within the if block to prevent
    shadowing the outer variable.

    src/components/ProjectCard.test.tsx [56-58]

     if (cardElement) {
    -  const cardElement = screen.getByTestId("project-card"); 
    -  expect(cardElement).toBeInTheDocument();
    +  const cardElementInner = screen.getByTestId("project-card"); 
    +  expect(cardElementInner).toBeInTheDocument();
     
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 6

    Why: This suggestion addresses a maintainability issue by preventing variable shadowing, which can lead to confusion in the code.

    6

    Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
    Labels
    ☑️ auto-merge Automatic merging of pull requests (gstraccini-bot) enhancement New feature or request Review effort [1-5]: 4 tests
    Projects
    None yet
    Development

    Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

    1 participant