-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update @vitest/coverage-v8 2.1.6 → 2.1.8 (patch) #37
Conversation
The files' contents are under analysis for test generation. |
Important Review skippedBot user detected. To trigger a single review, invoke the You can disable this status message by setting the 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Automatically approved by gstraccini[bot]
@depfu merge |
New and removed dependencies detected. Learn more about Socket for GitHub ↗︎
🚮 Removed packages: npm/@vitest/[email protected], npm/[email protected] |
🚨 Potential security issues detected. Learn more about Socket for GitHub ↗︎ To accept the risk, merge this PR and you will not be notified again.
Next stepsWhat is dynamic require?Dynamic require can indicate the package is performing dangerous or unsafe dynamic code execution. Packages should avoid dynamic imports when possible. Audit the use of dynamic require to ensure it is not executing malicious or vulnerable code. What are high entropy strings?Contains high entropy strings. This could be a sign of encrypted data, leaked secrets or obfuscated code. Please inspect these strings to check if they are benign. Maintainers should clarify the purpose and existence of high entropy strings if there is a legitimate purpose. Take a deeper look at the dependencyTake a moment to review the security alert above. Review the linked package source code to understand the potential risk. Ensure the package is not malicious before proceeding. If you're unsure how to proceed, reach out to your security team or ask the Socket team for help at support [AT] socket [DOT] dev. Remove the packageIf you happen to install a dependency that Socket reports as Known Malware you should immediately remove it and select a different dependency. For other alert types, you may may wish to investigate alternative packages or consider if there are other ways to mitigate the specific risk posed by the dependency. Mark a package as acceptable riskTo ignore an alert, reply with a comment starting with
|
Infisical secrets check: ✅ No secrets leaked! 💻 Scan logs1:18AM INF scanning for exposed secrets...
1:18AM INF 46 commits scanned.
1:18AM INF scan completed in 107ms
1:18AM INF no leaks found
|
Quality Gate passedIssues Measures |
Here is everything you need to know about this update. Please take a good look at what changed and the test results before merging this pull request.
What changed?
✳️ @vitest/coverage-v8 (2.1.6 → 2.1.8) · Repo
Release Notes
2.1.8
2.1.7
Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.
Commits
See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by 4 commits:
bump: 2.1.8
fix: support Node 21
chore: release v2.1.7
fix: revert support for Vite 6
✳️ vitest (2.1.6 → 2.1.8) · Repo
Release Notes
2.1.8
2.1.7
Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.
Commits
See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by 4 commits:
bump: 2.1.8
fix: support Node 21
chore: release v2.1.7
fix: revert support for Vite 6
Release Notes
2.1.8
2.1.7
Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.
Commits
See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by 4 commits:
bump: 2.1.8
fix: support Node 21
chore: release v2.1.7
fix: revert support for Vite 6
Release Notes
2.1.8
2.1.7
Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.
Commits
See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by 4 commits:
bump: 2.1.8
fix: support Node 21
chore: release v2.1.7
fix: revert support for Vite 6
Release Notes
2.1.8
2.1.7
Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.
Commits
See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by 4 commits:
bump: 2.1.8
fix: support Node 21
chore: release v2.1.7
fix: revert support for Vite 6
Release Notes
2.1.8
2.1.7
Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.
Commits
See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by 4 commits:
bump: 2.1.8
fix: support Node 21
chore: release v2.1.7
fix: revert support for Vite 6
Release Notes
2.1.8
2.1.7
Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.
Commits
See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by 4 commits:
bump: 2.1.8
fix: support Node 21
chore: release v2.1.7
fix: revert support for Vite 6
Release Notes
2.1.8
2.1.7
Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.
Commits
See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by 4 commits:
bump: 2.1.8
fix: support Node 21
chore: release v2.1.7
fix: revert support for Vite 6
Release Notes
2.1.8
2.1.7
Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.
Commits
See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by 4 commits:
bump: 2.1.8
fix: support Node 21
chore: release v2.1.7
fix: revert support for Vite 6
Release Notes
2.1.8
2.1.7
Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.
Commits
See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by 4 commits:
bump: 2.1.8
fix: support Node 21
chore: release v2.1.7
fix: revert support for Vite 6
🆕 @esbuild/aix-ppc64 (added, 0.21.5)
🆕 @esbuild/android-arm (added, 0.21.5)
🆕 @esbuild/android-arm64 (added, 0.21.5)
🆕 @esbuild/android-x64 (added, 0.21.5)
🆕 @esbuild/darwin-arm64 (added, 0.21.5)
🆕 @esbuild/darwin-x64 (added, 0.21.5)
🆕 @esbuild/freebsd-arm64 (added, 0.21.5)
🆕 @esbuild/freebsd-x64 (added, 0.21.5)
🆕 @esbuild/linux-arm (added, 0.21.5)
🆕 @esbuild/linux-arm64 (added, 0.21.5)
🆕 @esbuild/linux-ia32 (added, 0.21.5)
🆕 @esbuild/linux-loong64 (added, 0.21.5)
🆕 @esbuild/linux-mips64el (added, 0.21.5)
🆕 @esbuild/linux-ppc64 (added, 0.21.5)
🆕 @esbuild/linux-riscv64 (added, 0.21.5)
🆕 @esbuild/linux-s390x (added, 0.21.5)
🆕 @esbuild/linux-x64 (added, 0.21.5)
🆕 @esbuild/netbsd-x64 (added, 0.21.5)
🆕 @esbuild/openbsd-x64 (added, 0.21.5)
🆕 @esbuild/sunos-x64 (added, 0.21.5)
🆕 @esbuild/win32-arm64 (added, 0.21.5)
🆕 @esbuild/win32-ia32 (added, 0.21.5)
🆕 @esbuild/win32-x64 (added, 0.21.5)
🆕 esbuild (added, 0.21.5)
🆕 vite (added, 5.4.11)
Depfu will automatically keep this PR conflict-free, as long as you don't add any commits to this branch yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting with
@depfu rebase
.All Depfu comment commands