Feature/add exception handling #562
Conversation
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe pull request introduces significant changes to the Azure infrastructure and application code related to notification handling. The Changes
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![github-advanced-security[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/57789?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 13
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (10)
src/Altinn.Broker.Core/Options/GeneralSettings.cs (3)
3-4: Add XML documentation for the configuration class.Since this is a configuration class that will be bound from appsettings.json, adding XML documentation would help developers understand its purpose and usage in the application configuration.
+/// <summary> +/// Configuration options for general application settings. +/// </summary> public class GeneralSettings
1-8: Consider marking the class as sealed.Since this is a configuration class that's not designed for inheritance, marking it as sealed would make this intent explicit.
-public class GeneralSettings +public sealed class GeneralSettings
5-5: Add security headers for URL properties.Since both properties store URLs that will be used in HTTP requests, consider adding security attributes to indicate that these values should be treated as sensitive configuration.
+using System.ComponentModel.DataAnnotations; +using Microsoft.Extensions.Configuration; public sealed class GeneralSettings { + [Required] + [Sensitive] public string SlackUrl { get; set; } = string.Empty; + [Required] + [Sensitive] public string CorrespondenceBaseUrl { get; set; } = string.Empty; }Also applies to: 7-7
src/Altinn.Broker.API/Helpers/SecurityHeadersMiddleware.cs (2)
Line range hint
7-11: Enhance security headers coverage and configurability.While the current headers are good, consider adding these critical security headers:
- X-Frame-Options
- Strict-Transport-Security (HSTS)
- Content-Security-Policy
- X-XSS-Protection
Also, consider making the headers configurable through IConfiguration.
Here's a suggested implementation:
+private readonly IConfiguration _configuration; + +public SecurityHeadersMiddleware(RequestDelegate next, IConfiguration configuration) +{ + _configuration = configuration; + _next = next; +} public async Task InvokeAsync(HttpContext context) { context.Response.Headers.Append("X-Content-Type-Options", new StringValues("nosniff")); context.Response.Headers.Append("Cache-Control", new StringValues("no-store")); + context.Response.Headers.Append("X-Frame-Options", new StringValues("DENY")); + context.Response.Headers.Append("X-XSS-Protection", new StringValues("1; mode=block")); + context.Response.Headers.Append("Strict-Transport-Security", new StringValues("max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains")); + context.Response.Headers.Append("Content-Security-Policy", new StringValues(_configuration.GetValue<string>("SecurityHeaders:CSP") ?? "default-src 'self'")); await next(context); }
Line range hint
7-11: Add error handling and security logging.Consider adding try-catch block and logging for security audit purposes.
Here's a suggested implementation:
+private readonly ILogger<SecurityHeadersMiddleware> _logger; + +public SecurityHeadersMiddleware( + RequestDelegate next, + IConfiguration configuration, + ILogger<SecurityHeadersMiddleware> logger) +{ + _next = next; + _configuration = configuration; + _logger = logger; +} public async Task InvokeAsync(HttpContext context) { + try + { context.Response.Headers.Append("X-Content-Type-Options", new StringValues("nosniff")); context.Response.Headers.Append("Cache-Control", new StringValues("no-store")); + _logger.LogDebug("Security headers added successfully for request {Path}", context.Request.Path); + } + catch (Exception ex) + { + _logger.LogError(ex, "Failed to add security headers for request {Path}", context.Request.Path); + } await next(context); }src/Altinn.Broker.API/appsettings.Development.json (1)
37-39: LGTM! Consider adding documentation comments.The new
GeneralSettingssection is well-structured. Consider adding JSON comments to document:
- The expected format of the Slack webhook URL
- Whether these settings are required or optional
- The purpose of the correspondence base URL
Example documentation:
{ "GeneralSettings": { // Slack webhook URL for exception notifications. Leave empty to disable Slack notifications. "SlackUrl": "", // Base URL for correspondence service in the current environment "CorrespondenceBaseUrl": "https://localhost:7241/" } }.azure/modules/containerAppEnvironment/main.bicep (2)
42-42: Remove unnecessary empty line.This empty line appears to be an artifact from the removal of alert-related resources.
-
Line range hint
1-65: Consider documenting the new monitoring strategy.With the removal of email alerts, it would be beneficial to document how critical issues will be monitored and alerted on using the new Slack notification system. Consider:
- Ensuring Application Insights is properly configured to capture all relevant telemetry
- Documenting the transition from email to Slack notifications in the operations documentation
- Verifying that the Slack notification middleware (mentioned in PR objectives) has access to all necessary monitoring data
Would you like assistance in creating documentation for the new monitoring approach?
src/Altinn.Broker.Integrations/DependencyInjection.cs (1)
55-64: Consider a more extensible notification architecture.The current implementation is tightly coupled to Slack. Consider introducing an abstraction layer for notifications:
- Create an
INotificationServiceinterface- Implement
SlackNotificationServiceas one provider- Allow for easy addition of other notification channels (email, Teams, etc.)
Example structure:
public interface INotificationService { Task SendNotificationAsync(string message, NotificationPriority priority); } public class SlackNotificationService : INotificationService { private readonly ISlackClient _slackClient; public SlackNotificationService(ISlackClient slackClient) { _slackClient = slackClient; } public async Task SendNotificationAsync(string message, NotificationPriority priority) { // Implement Slack-specific logic } }src/Altinn.Broker.API/Helpers/SlackExceptionNotification.cs (1)
19-45: Consider utilizing the cancellation tokenThe
TryHandleAsyncmethod receives aCancellationTokenbut does not pass it to asynchronous operations. To respect cancellation requests, pass the token to any async methods that support it.Apply this diff to include the cancellation token:
try { - await SendSlackNotificationWithMessage(exceptionMessage); + await SendSlackNotificationWithMessage(exceptionMessage, cancellationToken); } catch (Exception slackEx) { _logger.LogError( slackEx, "Failed to send Slack notification"); }Update the
SendSlackNotificationWithMessagemethod signature:- private async Task SendSlackNotificationWithMessage(string message) + private async Task SendSlackNotificationWithMessage(string message, CancellationToken cancellationToken)And pass the token to
PostAsyncif it supports it:await _slackClient.PostAsync(slackMessage); + // If PostAsync supports cancellation tokens: + await _slackClient.PostAsync(slackMessage, cancellationToken);🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: CodeQL
[failure] 31-31: Log entries created from user input
This log entry depends on a user-provided value.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (14)
.azure/infrastructure/main.bicep(0 hunks).azure/infrastructure/params.bicepparam(0 hunks).azure/modules/containerAppEnvironment/main.bicep(1 hunks).github/actions/update-infrastructure/action.yml(0 hunks).github/workflows/deploy-to-environment.yml(0 hunks)src/Altinn.Broker.API/Helpers/SecurityHeadersMiddleware.cs(1 hunks)src/Altinn.Broker.API/Helpers/SlackExceptionNotification.cs(1 hunks)src/Altinn.Broker.API/Program.cs(3 hunks)src/Altinn.Broker.API/appsettings.Development.json(1 hunks)src/Altinn.Broker.Application/Altinn.Broker.Application.csproj(1 hunks)src/Altinn.Broker.Core/Options/GeneralSettings.cs(1 hunks)src/Altinn.Broker.Integrations/Altinn.Broker.Integrations.csproj(1 hunks)src/Altinn.Broker.Integrations/DependencyInjection.cs(2 hunks)src/Altinn.Broker.Integrations/Slack/SlackDevClient.cs(1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (4)
- .azure/infrastructure/main.bicep
- .azure/infrastructure/params.bicepparam
- .github/actions/update-infrastructure/action.yml
- .github/workflows/deploy-to-environment.yml
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 GitHub Check: CodeQL
src/Altinn.Broker.API/Helpers/SlackExceptionNotification.cs
[failure] 31-31: Log entries created from user input
This log entry depends on a user-provided value.
🔇 Additional comments (10)
src/Altinn.Broker.Core/Options/GeneralSettings.cs (1)
5-5: Consider validating the SlackUrl configuration at startup.
Since this URL is critical for exception notifications (as per PR objectives), consider implementing IValidateOptions to ensure the URL is properly configured at application startup.
src/Altinn.Broker.API/Helpers/SecurityHeadersMiddleware.cs (2)
3-5: LGTM! Clean and modern class structure.
The class follows good practices with a clear single responsibility and modern C# syntax.
Line range hint 3-11: Verify middleware registration and header conflicts.
Ensure this middleware is registered early in the pipeline and check for potential conflicts with existing security headers.
✅ Verification successful
Let me check the actual content of these files to verify the implementation details.
Security headers implementation is correctly placed and no conflicts found
The verification shows that:
- The
SecurityHeadersMiddlewareis registered early in the pipeline, right after request logging and before other middleware - No conflicting security header implementations exist:
- The only other header manipulation is in
AltinnTokenEventsHelper.cswhich setsWWW-Authenticatefor a different purpose
- The only other header manipulation is in
- The
X-Content-Type-OptionsandCache-Controlheaders are not set anywhere else in the codebase
The implementation is sound and follows security best practices.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for existing security header implementations
echo "Checking for existing security header implementations..."
rg -l "Response\.Headers\.Append" --type cs
# Check for middleware registration
echo "Checking middleware registration..."
rg -l "UseMiddleware.*SecurityHeadersMiddleware" --type cs
Length of output: 459
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the content of Program.cs to verify middleware registration order
echo "=== Program.cs middleware registration ==="
rg -A 5 -B 5 "UseMiddleware.*SecurityHeadersMiddleware" src/Altinn.Broker.API/Program.cs
# Check other security header implementations
echo -e "\n=== Security headers in AltinnTokenEventsHelper.cs ==="
rg "Response\.Headers\.Append" src/Altinn.Broker.API/Helpers/AltinnTokenEventsHelper.cs
# Check if there are any other middleware that might set security headers
echo -e "\n=== Other potential security header middleware ==="
rg -i "security.*header|header.*security" --type cs
Length of output: 1325
src/Altinn.Broker.Application/Altinn.Broker.Application.csproj (1)
16-16: Consider using a more actively maintained Slack SDK.
While Slack.Webhooks works for basic webhook integration, consider these points:
- The package hasn't been updated since 2021
- Official
Slack.NetStandardSDK offers more features and active maintenance
Additionally, ensure that the Slack webhook URL will be properly secured in configuration and not exposed in logs.
✅ Verification successful
Slack webhook URL is properly secured in the implementation
The verification shows that the Slack integration is implemented securely:
- Webhook URL is stored in configuration (
SlackUrlin appsettings.json) and properly empty in development settings - A dev client (
SlackDevClient) is used when no URL is configured - The implementation includes proper error handling and logging
- No hardcoded webhook URLs found in the codebase
The choice of Slack.Webhooks package, while older, is being used appropriately here with proper security considerations. The implementation is sound and doesn't expose sensitive information.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for potential webhook URL exposure in configuration files
# Expect: No plaintext webhook URLs in configuration or code files
rg -i "hooks\.slack\.com/services"
Length of output: 36
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's analyze the codebase for Slack webhook configuration patterns and usage
# Check for Slack-related configuration patterns in appsettings files
echo "Checking configuration files for Slack settings:"
rg -i "slack|webhook" --type json
# Look for Slack configuration in C# files
echo -e "\nChecking C# files for Slack configuration and usage:"
rg -i "slack|webhook" --type csharp -A 3
# Search for IConfiguration usage with Slack
echo -e "\nChecking for configuration bindings:"
ast-grep --pattern 'Configuration.GetValue<string>($_)'
Length of output: 15923
src/Altinn.Broker.Integrations/Altinn.Broker.Integrations.csproj (1)
22-22: Verify Slack.Webhooks package version and security.
The addition of the Slack.Webhooks package aligns well with the PR's objective to implement Slack notifications for exception handling.
Let's verify the package version and security:
✅ Verification successful
Package version is up-to-date and no security concerns found
The verification confirms:
- Version 1.1.5 is the latest stable version available on NuGet
- No security-related issues or vulnerabilities were found in the codebase related to Slack.Webhooks usage
- The security-related findings in the codebase are unrelated to the Slack.Webhooks package
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if we're using the latest version and if there are any known vulnerabilities
# Test 1: Check if there's a newer version available in the nuget feed
curl -s "https://api.nuget.org/v3-flatcontainer/slack.webhooks/index.json" | jq -r '.versions | .[]' | sort -V | tail -n 1
# Test 2: Look for any security-related comments or TODOs in the codebase
rg -i "security|vulnerability|hack|todo|fixme" --type csharp
Length of output: 3147
src/Altinn.Broker.Integrations/Slack/SlackDevClient.cs (1)
1-46: Verify integration with SlackExceptionNotification middleware.
Since this client is part of the exception handling feature mentioned in the PR objectives, we should verify its integration with the SlackExceptionNotification middleware.
✅ Verification successful
Integration with exception handling middleware is properly implemented
The verification shows that the SlackDevClient is correctly integrated with the exception handling middleware:
- The SlackExceptionNotification is properly registered as an exception handler using
services.AddExceptionHandler<SlackExceptionNotification>()in Program.cs - The middleware is correctly implemented as an IExceptionHandler with proper DI of ISlackClient
- The ISlackClient is registered appropriately in DependencyInjection.cs:
- Development:
new SlackDevClient("") - Production:
new SlackClient(generalSettings.SlackUrl)
- Development:
- The exception handler properly formats and sends notifications to Slack with error details and environment information
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for middleware configuration and usage
echo "Searching for middleware configuration..."
rg -l "SlackExceptionNotification|UseMiddleware.*Slack" --type cs
echo "Searching for exception handler registration..."
ast-grep --pattern 'services.AddScoped<$_>($$$)' --lang cs
echo "Searching for webhook URL configuration..."
rg "SlackUrl|WebhookUrl" --type json
Length of output: 1859
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the middleware and its integration
echo "=== Examining SlackExceptionNotification implementation ==="
cat "src/Altinn.Broker.API/Helpers/SlackExceptionNotification.cs"
echo -e "\n=== Checking Program.cs for middleware registration ==="
cat "src/Altinn.Broker.API/Program.cs"
echo -e "\n=== Looking for ISlackClient registration ==="
rg "ISlackClient" --type cs -A 5
Length of output: 13103
.azure/modules/containerAppEnvironment/main.bicep (1)
Line range hint 1-65: Verify complete removal of alerting resources.
The removal of email notification resources should be verified to ensure no orphaned references remain.
✅ Verification successful
No alerting resources found in the codebase
After thorough examination of the Bicep files, I can confirm that there are no alerting or email notification resources present. The only Microsoft.Insights resource found is Application Insights, which is used for application monitoring and telemetry. The removal of email notification resources appears to be complete with no orphaned references remaining.
The only monitoring-related resources present are:
- Application Insights for application telemetry
- Log Analytics workspace for container app logs
- Event Grid for malware scan notifications (webhook-based, not email)
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any remaining references to alerts or email notifications
# across Bicep files and GitHub workflows
# Search for alert-related resource references
echo "Checking for alert-related resources..."
rg -i "microsoft\.insights/(actiongroups|scheduledqueryrules|metricalerts)"
# Search for email notification references
echo "Checking for email notification references..."
rg -i "notification.*email|email.*notification|emailreceiver"
Length of output: 331
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a broader search for alert and notification related terms
# across Bicep files and workflows
# Search in Bicep files
echo "Searching Bicep files for alert/notification related terms..."
fd -e bicep -x rg -l -i "alert|notification|monitor|actiongroup|emailreceiver|metricalert" {}
# Check for any Microsoft.Insights resources
echo "Checking for Microsoft.Insights resources..."
fd -e bicep -x rg -l "Microsoft\.Insights" {}
# Look for any monitoring or alerting related parameters
echo "Checking for monitoring related parameters..."
fd -e bicep -x rg -l "param.*monitor|param.*alert|param.*notification" {}
# Check workflow files for any monitoring/alerting configuration
echo "Checking workflow files for monitoring configuration..."
fd -e yml -e yaml -x rg -l -i "alert|notification|monitor" {}
Length of output: 745
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a more targeted approach by examining the specific files
# and their history for alert-related resources
# Check the content of the containerAppEnvironment module
echo "Current content of containerAppEnvironment module:"
cat .azure/modules/containerAppEnvironment/main.bicep
# Look for any Insights resources in the current directory
echo "Looking for Microsoft.Insights resources in the module:"
rg -A 3 -B 3 "Microsoft\.Insights" .azure/modules/containerAppEnvironment/main.bicep
# Check if there are any other Bicep files in the modules directory
echo "Listing all Bicep files in modules:"
fd -e bicep . .azure/modules/
# Check the content of any other Bicep files that might contain monitoring
echo "Checking content of other Bicep files:"
fd -e bicep . .azure/modules/ -x cat {}
Length of output: 21099
src/Altinn.Broker.Integrations/DependencyInjection.cs (1)
57-64:
Improve Slack client registration and configuration.
Several improvements needed:
- Validate SlackUrl format
- Use factory pattern for client creation
- Allow mocking for testing
- Secure sensitive configuration
Consider this improved implementation:
-if (string.IsNullOrWhiteSpace(generalSettings.SlackUrl))
-{
- services.AddSingleton<ISlackClient>(new SlackDevClient(""));
-}
-else
-{
- services.AddSingleton<ISlackClient>(new SlackClient(generalSettings.SlackUrl));
-}
+services.AddSingleton<ISlackClient>(sp =>
+{
+ var settings = sp.GetRequiredService<IOptions<GeneralSettings>>().Value;
+ if (string.IsNullOrWhiteSpace(settings.SlackUrl))
+ {
+ return new SlackDevClient("");
+ }
+
+ if (!Uri.TryCreate(settings.SlackUrl, UriKind.Absolute, out _))
+ {
+ throw new InvalidOperationException("Invalid Slack webhook URL format");
+ }
+
+ return new SlackClient(settings.SlackUrl);
+});Also, ensure that SlackUrl is stored securely:
- Use Azure Key Vault or similar service in production
- Mark the configuration as sensitive
#!/bin/bash
# Check if SlackUrl is properly secured in configuration files
rg "SlackUrl|slack.*url" --type jsonsrc/Altinn.Broker.API/Program.cs (2)
16-16: LGTM!
The addition of the Helpers namespace is necessary for the new exception handling functionality.
101-101: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Verify Slack configuration and add resilience.
The Slack exception handler is registered, but there are some considerations:
- Ensure GeneralSettings with SlackUrl is configured
- Consider adding retry policies for Slack notifications
- Add fallback logging when Slack is unavailable
Let's verify the configuration:
Consider registering with retry policies:
+ services.AddHttpClient("SlackNotification")
+ .AddTransientHttpErrorPolicy(builder => builder.WaitAndRetryAsync(
+ 3,
+ retryAttempt => TimeSpan.FromSeconds(Math.Pow(2, retryAttempt))
+ ));
services.AddExceptionHandler<SlackExceptionNotification>();
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
src/Altinn.Broker.Integrations/Slack/SlackDevClient.cs (1)
1-46: Add security measures for development environment.Even in a development environment, consider implementing basic security measures:
- Validate message content to prevent injection
- Add rate limiting to prevent abuse
- Sanitize sensitive information from logs
Consider implementing a rate limiter:
private static readonly SemaphoreSlim _rateLimiter = new(1, 1); private static readonly TimeSpan _rateLimitWindow = TimeSpan.FromSeconds(1); private async Task<bool> ExecuteWithRateLimit(Func<Task<bool>> action) { if (await _rateLimiter.WaitAsync(_rateLimitWindow)) { try { return await action(); } finally { _rateLimiter.Release(); } } throw new SlackNotificationException("Rate limit exceeded"); }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
src/Altinn.Broker.Integrations/DependencyInjection.cs(2 hunks)src/Altinn.Broker.Integrations/Slack/SlackDevClient.cs(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- src/Altinn.Broker.Integrations/DependencyInjection.cs
mSunberg
added
the
kind/feature
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
src/Altinn.Broker.API/Controllers/FileTransferController.cs (2)
Line range hint
90-93: Missingreturnstatement after handling errorIn the
InitializeAndUploadmethod, after checkingif (initializeResult.IsT1), you callProblem(initializeResult.AsT1);but do not return the result. This means execution continues, and you attempt to accessinitializeResult.AsT0, which could lead to a runtime exception. Please add areturnstatement to return theProblemresult and prevent further execution.Suggested fix:
if (initializeResult.IsT1) { - Problem(initializeResult.AsT1); + return Problem(initializeResult.AsT1); }
Line range hint
148-149: Typo in variable nameproccessingFunctionThe variable name
proccessingFunctionis misspelled. It should beprocessingFunction.Suggested fix:
- var proccessingFunction = new Func<Task<OneOf<Task, Error>>>(() => handler.Process(requestData, cancellationToken)); + var processingFunction = new Func<Task<OneOf<Task, Error>>>(() => handler.Process(requestData, cancellationToken)); var uniqueString = $"confirmDownload_{fileTransferId}_{token.Consumer}"; - var commandResult = await IdempotencyEventHelper.ProcessEvent(uniqueString, proccessingFunction, idempotencyEventRepository, cancellationToken); + var commandResult = await IdempotencyEventHelper.ProcessEvent(uniqueString, processingFunction, idempotencyEventRepository, cancellationToken);
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
.azure/modules/containerApp/main.bicep (1)
101-105: LGTM! Secret configuration follows Azure security best practices.The secret configuration properly uses managed identity for Key Vault access, maintaining security best practices.
Minor formatting suggestion to maintain consistency with other secret blocks:
- { - identity: principal_id - keyVaultUrl: '${keyVaultUrl}/secrets/slack-url' - name: 'slack-url' - } + { + identity: principal_id + keyVaultUrl: '${keyVaultUrl}/secrets/slack-url' + name: 'slack-url' + }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
.azure/infrastructure/main.bicep(2 hunks).azure/infrastructure/params.bicepparam(1 hunks).azure/modules/containerApp/main.bicep(2 hunks).github/actions/update-infrastructure/action.yml(2 hunks).github/workflows/deploy-to-environment.yml(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (4)
- .azure/infrastructure/main.bicep
- .azure/infrastructure/params.bicepparam
- .github/actions/update-infrastructure/action.yml
- .github/workflows/deploy-to-environment.yml
🔇 Additional comments (1)
.azure/modules/containerApp/main.bicep (1)
57-57: LGTM! Environment variable configuration follows best practices.
The Slack URL configuration is properly implemented using secret reference, following security best practices.
Let's verify the consistency of this configuration across environments:
✅ Verification successful
Configuration is properly set up and consistent across infrastructure files
The Slack URL configuration is correctly implemented with:
- Secret reference in container app environment variables
- Proper Key Vault secret binding in container app configuration
- Corresponding secret definition in the main infrastructure template
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify Slack URL configuration across infrastructure files
# Expected: The Slack URL configuration should be consistent across all environment deployments
# Search for Slack URL related configurations
rg "SlackUrl|slack-url" .azure/
Length of output: 355
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the complete context of these configurations to ensure proper setup
echo "=== Checking main.bicep configuration ==="
rg -A 5 -B 5 'slack-url' .azure/infrastructure/main.bicep
echo -e "\n=== Checking containerApp/main.bicep configuration ==="
rg -A 5 -B 5 'slack-url' .azure/modules/containerApp/main.bicep
Length of output: 1204
…n/altinn-broker into feature/addExceptionHandling
Description
Added new middleware "SlackExceptionNotification" for catching unknown exceptions and sending notification to #test-varslinger on slack.
Related Issue(s)
Verification
Documentation
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation
Chores
Refactor