[DRAFT] PoC implementation of ISO-SBOM #41
Draft
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Store 'None' if build-related data is empty
This patch allows users to create a package SBOM by specifying the RPM package itself without having to calculate a hash value. This also allows the SBOM field to be extended since the package information can be referenced within alma_sbom.
|
I was able to create an SBOM for AlmaLinux 9.2 minimal ISO. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is Draft PR. DO NOT MERGE this PR.
This PR allow us to make ISO-SBOM.
Now we can get cyclonedx-SBOM of dvd-ISO and minimal-ISO.
At present, however, SBOMs can be generated only when the number of packages is explicitly narrowed down, not for all packages included in the ISO.
If individual package-SBOMs cannot be generated for all the packages in the ISO, the ISO-SBOM cannot be generated either.
At this time, I've found some packages for which package-SBOMs cannot be generated, and we plan to fix this in other MR.
Moreover, the following implementations and considerations need to be addressed, and once they are resolved, the draft status is expected to be removed: