Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Appveyor tests #81

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Apr 23, 2018
Merged

Appveyor tests #81

merged 6 commits into from
Apr 23, 2018

Conversation

JFPerkins
Copy link
Contributor

Adds basic appveyor builds for 2.7 and 3.6. Incorporates some test cleanup to prevent tests hanging on Windows. Demonstrates #80 .

@JFPerkins JFPerkins requested a review from fcollman April 20, 2018 21:54
@JFPerkins
Copy link
Contributor Author

I guess it doesn't want to build the PR without having the .appveyor.yml in dev yet? Link to branch build: https://ci.appveyor.com/project/JFPerkins/argschema

@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Apr 20, 2018

Codecov Report

Merging #81 into dev will decrease coverage by 0.2%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##              dev      #81      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   97.29%   97.08%   -0.21%     
==========================================
  Files          13       13              
  Lines         480      480              
==========================================
- Hits          467      466       -1     
- Misses         13       14       +1
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
argschema/argschema_parser.py 98.11% <0%> (-0.95%) ⬇️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 66b9a66...6268005. Read the comment docs.

@fcollman fcollman merged commit de717cd into AllenInstitute:dev Apr 23, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants