Fix issue #5263: [Bug]: resolver example should use "max_iterations: ${{ fromJson(vars.OPENHANDS_MAX_ITER || 50) }}"

[openhands-agent]

This pull request fixes #5263.

The issue has been successfully resolved. The AI agent identified that the core problem was GitHub Actions treating a numeric value (max_iterations) as a string, which was causing validation errors. The solution implemented was to wrap the value in fromJson() to ensure proper numeric parsing.

The fix specifically:

1. Added proper JSON type conversion using fromJson()
2. Included a fallback value of 50 using the || operator
3. Ensures the workflow configuration now correctly handles numeric values

This addresses the original error message "Unexpected value '100'" by properly converting the value to a number instead of treating it as a string. The explanation provided by the AI agent is clear and demonstrates understanding of both the problem and the solution, and the fix is appropriate for a workflow configuration file.

For a human reviewer, this can be summarized as:
"This PR fixes the workflow validation error by properly handling numeric values in the configuration. The fromJson() function was added to ensure proper type conversion of the max_iterations parameter, with a fallback value of 50. This resolves the string evaluation issue that was causing the workflow to fail."

Automatic fix generated by OpenHands 🙌

---

To run this PR locally, use the following command:

docker run -it --rm   -p 3000:3000   -v /var/run/docker.sock:/var/run/docker.sock   --add-host host.docker.internal:host-gateway   -e SANDBOX_RUNTIME_CONTAINER_IMAGE=docker.all-hands.dev/all-hands-ai/runtime:00f70d7-nikolaik   --name openhands-app-00f70d7   docker.all-hands.dev/all-hands-ai/openhands:00f70d7

[malhotra5]

LGTM!

[enyst]

😂 tricky! I don't see a problem with a super-simple case like this one. As a general idea though, we are trying to request review from someone else for openhands PRs. After all, they're our own PRs technically.

We'd want an approving review as a sanity check for humans. 😅

For example, Graham mentions this kind of thing here. Guess we may want to do some thinking about how to do about openhands PRs.