-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix issue #5186: [Bug]: Fix up inline code styles in chat window #5226
Merged
Merged
Changes from 11 commits
Commits
Show all changes
12 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
cebb938
Fix issue #5186: [Bug]: Fix up inline code styles in chat window
openhands-agent 32bdb1b
Fix pr #5226: Fix issue #5186: [Bug]: Fix up inline code styles in ch…
openhands-agent 880c7f8
Merge branch 'main' into openhands-fix-issue-5186
neubig a1ab2f2
Fix inline code background color to be lighter and more visible
openhands-agent cce9472
Fix inline code background color to be lighter and more visible
openhands-agent 3976cb5
Simplify chat message test to fix CI failures
openhands-agent 83b3ee7
Fix chat message test to be more resilient
openhands-agent dbd0bb4
Fix inline code background color to be lighter
openhands-agent fde8158
Fix linting issues
openhands-agent 10443fb
Fix TypeScript error in addErrorMessage call
openhands-agent b76c9eb
Merge branch 'main' into openhands-fix-issue-5186
neubig 79eabad
Merge and resolve
amanape File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The test title "should apply correct styles to inline code" is unrelated to what the test actually does (check if the elements exist)
Here we check for the presence of a
code
element only if the content contains backticks. We remove the check forarticle
since that is the message wrapper which we test various times in previous tests.If we want to test styles, I believe we can take advantage of snapshot testing