Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs: uniform appCommands example code #325

Conversation

DraconicDragon
Copy link
Contributor

Description

Changes context to ctx in the Application Commands articles' example code to match the rest of the documentation.

Type of change

Please delete options that are not relevant.

  • This change requires a documentation update

Checklist:

  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • My changes generate no new warnings
  • Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream modules

@Aiko-IT-Systems/discatsharp

@DraconicDragon DraconicDragon requested review from a team, NyuwBot and Lulalaby as code owners July 1, 2023 22:18
@DraconicDragon DraconicDragon requested review from cking and removed request for a team July 1, 2023 22:18
@CLAassistant
Copy link

CLA assistant check
Thank you for your submission! We really appreciate it. Like many open source projects, we ask that you sign our Contributor License Agreement before we can accept your contribution.
You have signed the CLA already but the status is still pending? Let us recheck it.

@NyuwBot NyuwBot added the documentation Improvements or additions to documentation label Jul 1, 2023
@Lulalaby Lulalaby requested review from TheXorog and removed request for cking July 1, 2023 22:21
@Lulalaby Lulalaby merged commit 861ca2d into Aiko-IT-Systems:feat/lib-dev-rework Jul 1, 2023
3 of 5 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants