-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 620
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Support negative stride #1324
Open
huww98
wants to merge
2
commits into
AcademySoftwareFoundation:main
Choose a base branch
from
huww98:feature/negative-stride
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Support negative stride #1324
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
since an API change is involved, there'd be a version bump to OpenEXR required. Perhaps we should retain the existing signature in addition to introducing a new one, and have the size_t variant call the ptrdiff_t variant with appropriate casting to silence warnings.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think both gcc and clang (-Wall) would not produce warnings when passing
size_t
argument toptrdiff_t
parameter.But these changes do break the ABI. However, OpenEXR usually has version number in its soname. So the binary capability would break after the next minor release anyway. Should I try to keep ABI capability in this PR?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It strikes me that supporting flipping images on read is definitely a useful missing feature, but doing it by passing a negative stride is kind of a hack, rather than a clean friendly API feature. In particular, it's not obvious what the base pointer should be when the image dataWindow doesn't match the displayWindow.
One option would be to leave the constructor using size_t, but use ptrdiff_t internally, and add a new Make() static method for flipped images that createa a Slice with a negative stride and computes the correct base pointer for you.
That should also be a less significant ABI change than modifying the constructor.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm writing a python extension. In my use case, I would definitely want to pass negative strides directly, because I could get negative strides from NumPy.
If we want to be more friendly to C++ users, instead of adding more
Make
overloads, how about addingSlice::flipX()
andSlice::flipY()
methods that negate the strides of an existingSlice
and compute the base pointer?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
To my way of thinking, passing ptrdiff_t is less confusing at first blush than creating an unflipped datawindow. The displayWindow has to be an "increasing in memory, 0,0 upper left window".
would it make sense to say displaywindow and datawindow have to be in harmony?
in other words, if xs < 0, then origin is right instead of left, if ys < 0, origin is bottom instead of top?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If you mean the
base
pointer, then yes. thebase
pointer always points to the logical (0,0) pixel in the .exr file, but may not point to the first byte in the FrameBuffer Slice with negative stride. And this formula should always hold true:openexr/src/lib/OpenEXR/ImfFrameBuffer.h
Line 49 in 55bdfd1
.header().dataWindow().min
should still less than or equal to.header().dataWindow().max