-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 96
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
SE keys: fix psa_destroy_key; add Github issue numbers for missing code #221
Merged
gilles-peskine-arm
merged 8 commits into
ARMmbed:psa-api-1.0-beta
from
gilles-peskine-arm:annotate_todo_comments-20190813
Aug 14, 2019
Merged
SE keys: fix psa_destroy_key; add Github issue numbers for missing code #221
gilles-peskine-arm
merged 8 commits into
ARMmbed:psa-api-1.0-beta
from
gilles-peskine-arm:annotate_todo_comments-20190813
Aug 14, 2019
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
When a key slot is wiped, a copy of the key material may remain in operations. This is undesirable, but does not violate the safety of the code. Tracked in https://github.com/ARMmbed/mbed-crypto/issues/86
Adopt a simple method for tracking whether there was a failure: each fallible operation sets overall_status, unless overall_status is already non-successful. Thus in case of multiple failures, the function always reports whatever failed first. This may not always be the right thing, but it's simple. This revealed a bug whereby if the only failure was the call to psa_destroy_se_key(), i.e. if the driver reported a failure or if the driver lacked support for destroying keys, psa_destroy_key() would ignore that failure. For a key in a secure element, if creating a transaction file fails, don't touch storage, but close the key in memory. This may not be right, but it's no wronger than it was before. Tracked in ARMmbed#215
Drivers that allow destroying a key must have a destroy method. This test bug was previously not caught because of an implementation bug that lost the error triggered by the missing destroy method.
yanesca
approved these changes
Aug 14, 2019
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I have a couple of questions, but no change requests. Looks good to me.
k-stachowiak
approved these changes
Aug 14, 2019
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
api-spec
Issue or PR about the PSA specifications
bug
Something isn't working
enhancement
New feature or request
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I went through FIXME/TODO comments in the code and added the corresponding issue numbers:
I also modified a comment relating to https://github.com/ARMmbed/mbed-crypto/issues/86 (not related to secure elements) but did not add an issue number because this is not exactly a bug and may even be resolved differently.
While doing this, I found two bugs in
psa_destroy_key
which I fixed and added a test for (in one case, I actually fixed a test bug that was hidden by the implementation bug).I'm making this PR to
psa-api-1.0-beta
to be on top of the latest SE work. Once this PR is merged, we should do another merge frompsa-api-1.0-beta
following #212.