Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

EB Boundary Area: Fix issues for anisotropic cell size #4131

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 5, 2024

Conversation

WeiqunZhang
Copy link
Member

  • In 2D, the scaling in incorrect. For example, if dx >> dy and the boundary is parallel to the x-direction, it would produce inf for the scaled boundary area.

  • In 3D, the scaling has been modified so that it's easy to convert from the dimensionless boundary area to physical units.

* In 2D, the scaling in incorrect. For example, if dx >> dy and the boundary
  is parallel to the x-direction, it would produce inf for the scaled
  boundary area.

* In 3D, the scaling has been modified so that it's easy to convert from the
  dimensionless boundary area to physical units.
@WeiqunZhang
Copy link
Member Author

I will update the documentation and then merge.

@WeiqunZhang
Copy link
Member Author

@RemiLehe

@WeiqunZhang WeiqunZhang enabled auto-merge (squash) September 5, 2024 18:36
@WeiqunZhang WeiqunZhang merged commit 08eed95 into AMReX-Codes:development Sep 5, 2024
59 checks passed
@WeiqunZhang WeiqunZhang deleted the eb_ba branch September 5, 2024 18:52
WeiqunZhang added a commit to WeiqunZhang/amrex that referenced this pull request Sep 6, 2024
WeiqunZhang added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 6, 2024
Missing sqrt.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants