You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I see you updated the modules and included end effectors to the data. It's nice to have them in there and I am looking forward to integrating them in our simulation! However, I had to make a couple of changes in order to being able to load them, and I wanted to ask you whether those could be included in the official JSON data here:
For the connector "type" of end effectors, there's a reserved keyword in our schema which is "eef". Currently, they are of type "tcp". Changing tcp --> eef would enable us to parse them as end effectors automatically
In the new modules, not only the visual but also the collision geometries had a color attribute. I just removed them for now - do you plan to include color attributes to collision geometries in the future or could we remove them entirely?
The "color: grey" for the new modules is now a one level above where it is for the other modules. (module -> bodies -> visual -> color VS module -> bodies -> visual -> parameters -> color) Would it be possible to keep the latter (contained in parameters) structure for all modules?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
the issues related to the 'color' attribute were all bugs from my side, now we have the 'color' attribute only under 'parameters' in the 'visual' properties. I did change the structure a bit:
'color' now needs a 'material_name' attribute (the urdf requires it so it needs to be there, but it can be a random string) and a 'rgba' attribute to specify the color.
If the 'material_name' is already defined in the urdf, one can omit the 'rgba' property, but the 'material_name' is always needed.
is it ensured that "rgba" will always be present in the "color" field? This would make the parsing significantly easier for me.
These two ("eef", "base") are the only reserved keywords for the connector types. They were not included in the PDF you have, but we pushed the updates to the online documentation, available here: https://cobra.cps.cit.tum.de/crok-documentation/robot
Hey all, dear @EdoardoRomiti ,
I see you updated the modules and included end effectors to the data. It's nice to have them in there and I am looking forward to integrating them in our simulation! However, I had to make a couple of changes in order to being able to load them, and I wanted to ask you whether those could be included in the official JSON data here:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: