Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

github bad manipulation, should be deleted #294

Closed
mmougy opened this issue Feb 6, 2025 · 0 comments
Closed

github bad manipulation, should be deleted #294

mmougy opened this issue Feb 6, 2025 · 0 comments

Comments

@mmougy
Copy link

mmougy commented Feb 6, 2025

No description provided.

@mmougy mmougy closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Feb 6, 2025
@mmougy mmougy changed the title I just commented on the [issue](https://github.com/zzorba/marvelsdb/issues/250) that I think the original proposal for scheme_amplify was misguided based on following the same pattern of scheme_acceleration, scheme_crisis, and scheme_hazard. The amplify icon isn't tied to just the scheme card types nor is it solely used when scheming so using scheme_ as the prefix for the property doesn't make a lot of sense. I think this new property should just be amplify and I think it should be a number. github bad manipulation, should be deleted Feb 6, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant