We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Exercise 10.9. "hence is t-count is" redundant "is"
Theorem 10.3.9 It is probably quite important to add that U and V implement the same unitary.
10.5.2 "likeT", give them some space
Page 452 Is it supposed to be \langle O\rangle_j or rather \langle O_j \rangle? (Multiple Occurences on that page and following)
Page 454 "If you"
Exercise 11.1 Yes, this equality holds. I checked multiple times.
Page 516 "m" seems to be seeking some attention and going places it shouldn't
Page 518 turn"s"
Definition 11.4.3 "the" -> "to"
PS: Overall a nice read
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
1a) 10.3.9 Rather UV^dagger instead of U^daggerV I guess?
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
Exercise 10.9.
"hence is t-count is" redundant "is"
Theorem 10.3.9
It is probably quite important to add that U and V implement the same unitary.
10.5.2
"likeT", give them some space
Page 452
Is it supposed to be \langle O\rangle_j or rather \langle O_j \rangle? (Multiple Occurences on that page and following)
Page 454
"If you"
Exercise 11.1
Yes, this equality holds. I checked multiple times.
Page 516
"m" seems to be seeking some attention and going places it shouldn't
Page 518
turn"s"
Definition 11.4.3
"the" -> "to"
PS: Overall a nice read
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: