If you are using a released version of Kubernetes, you should refer to the docs that go with that version.
The latest release of this document can be found [here](http://releases.k8s.io/release-1.1/docs/user-guide/compute-resources.md).Documentation for other releases can be found at releases.k8s.io.
Table of Contents
When specifying a pod, you can optionally specify how much CPU and memory (RAM) each container needs. When containers have their resource requests specified, the scheduler is able to make better decisions about which nodes to place pods on; and when containers have their limits specified, contention for resources on a node can be handled in a specified manner. For more details about the difference between requests and limits, please refer to Resource QoS.
CPU and memory are each a resource type. A resource type has a base unit. CPU is specified in units of cores. Memory is specified in units of bytes.
CPU and RAM are collectively referred to as compute resources, or just resources. Compute resources are measureable quantities which can be requested, allocated, and consumed. They are distinct from API resources. API resources, such as pods and services are objects that can be written to and retrieved from the Kubernetes API server.
Each container of a Pod can optionally specify spec.container[].resources.limits.cpu
and/or
spec.container[].resources.limits.memory
and/or spec.container[].resources.requests.cpu
and/or spec.container[].resources.requests.memory
.
Specifying resource requests and/or limits is optional. In some clusters, unset limits or requests may be replaced with default values when a pod is created or updated. The default value depends on how the cluster is configured. If value of requests is not specified, they are set to be equal to limits by default. Please note that resource limits must be greater than or equal to resource requests.
Although requests/limits can only be specified on individual containers, it is convenient to talk about pod resource requests/limits. A pod resource request/limit for a particular resource type is the sum of the resource requests/limits of that type for each container in the pod, with unset values treated as zero (or equal to default values in some cluster configurations).
The following pod has two containers. Each has a request of 0.25 core of cpu and 64MiB (220 bytes) of memory and a limit of 0.5 core of cpu and 128MiB of memory. The pod can be said to have a request of 0.5 core and 128 MiB of memory and a limit of 1 core and 256MiB of memory.
apiVersion: v1
kind: Pod
metadata:
name: frontend
spec:
containers:
- name: db
image: mysql
resources:
requests:
memory: "64Mi"
cpu: "250m"
limits:
memory: "128Mi"
cpu: "500m"
- name: wp
image: wordpress
resources:
requests:
memory: "64Mi"
cpu: "250m"
limits:
memory: "128Mi"
cpu: "500m"
When a pod is created, the Kubernetes scheduler selects a node for the pod to run on. Each node has a maximum capacity for each of the resource types: the amount of CPU and memory it can provide for pods. The scheduler ensures that, for each resource type (CPU and memory), the sum of the resource requests of the containers scheduled to the node is less than the capacity of the node. Note that although actual memory or CPU resource usage on nodes is very low, the scheduler will still refuse to place pods onto nodes if the capacity check fails. This protects against a resource shortage on a node when resource usage later increases, such as due to a daily peak in request rate.
When kubelet starts a container of a pod, it passes the CPU and memory limits to the container runner (Docker or rkt).
When using Docker:
- The
spec.container[].resources.limits.cpu
is multiplied by 1024, converted to an integer, and used as the value of the--cpu-shares
flag to thedocker run
command. - The
spec.container[].resources.limits.memory
is converted to an integer, and used as the value of the--memory
flag to thedocker run
command.
TODO: document behavior for rkt
If a container exceeds its memory limit, it may be terminated. If it is restartable, it will be restarted by kubelet, as will any other type of runtime failure.
A container may or may not be allowed to exceed its CPU limit for extended periods of time. However, it will not be killed for excessive CPU usage.
To determine if a container cannot be scheduled or is being killed due to resource limits, see the "Troubleshooting" section below.
The resource usage of a pod is reported as part of the Pod status.
If optional monitoring is configured for your cluster, then pod resource usage can be retrieved from the monitoring system.
If the scheduler cannot find any node where a pod can fit, then the pod will remain unscheduled until a place can be found. An event will be produced each time the scheduler fails to find a place for the pod, like this:
$ kubectl describe pod frontend | grep -A 3 Events
Events:
FirstSeen LastSeen Count From Subobject PathReason Message
36s 5s 6 {scheduler } FailedScheduling Failed for reason PodExceedsFreeCPU and possibly others
In the case shown above, the pod "frontend" fails to be scheduled due to insufficient CPU resource on the node. Similar error messages can also suggest failure due to insufficient memory (PodExceedsFreeMemory). In general, if a pod or pods are pending with this message and alike, then there are several things to try:
- Add more nodes to the cluster.
- Terminate unneeded pods to make room for pending pods.
- Check that the pod is not larger than all the nodes. For example, if all the nodes
have a capacity of
cpu: 1
, then a pod with a limit ofcpu: 1.1
will never be scheduled.
You can check node capacities and amounts allocated with the kubectl describe nodes
command.
For example:
$ kubectl describe nodes gke-cluster-4-386701dd-node-ww4p
Name: gke-cluster-4-386701dd-node-ww4p
[ ... lines removed for clarity ...]
Capacity:
cpu: 1
memory: 464Mi
pods: 40
Allocated resources (total requests):
cpu: 910m
memory: 2370Mi
pods: 4
[ ... lines removed for clarity ...]
Pods: (4 in total)
Namespace Name CPU(milliCPU) Memory(bytes)
frontend webserver-ffj8j 500 (50% of total) 2097152000 (50% of total)
kube-system fluentd-cloud-logging-gke-cluster-4-386701dd-node-ww4p 100 (10% of total) 209715200 (5% of total)
kube-system kube-dns-v8-qopgw 310 (31% of total) 178257920 (4% of total)
TotalResourceLimits:
CPU(milliCPU): 910 (91% of total)
Memory(bytes): 2485125120 (59% of total)
[ ... lines removed for clarity ...]
Here you can see from the Allocated resources
section that that a pod which ask for more than
90 millicpus or more than 1341MiB of memory will not be able to fit on this node.
Looking at the Pods
section, you can see which pods are taking up space on the node.
The resource quota feature can be configured to limit the total amount of resources that can be consumed. If used in conjunction with namespaces, it can prevent one team from hogging all the resources.
Your container may be terminated because it's resource-starved. To check if a container is being killed because it is hitting a resource limit, call kubectl describe pod
on the pod you are interested in:
[12:54:41] $ ./cluster/kubectl.sh describe pod simmemleak-hra99
Name: simmemleak-hra99
Namespace: default
Image(s): saadali/simmemleak
Node: kubernetes-node-tf0f/10.240.216.66
Labels: name=simmemleak
Status: Running
Reason:
Message:
IP: 10.244.2.75
Replication Controllers: simmemleak (1/1 replicas created)
Containers:
simmemleak:
Image: saadali/simmemleak
Limits:
cpu: 100m
memory: 50Mi
State: Running
Started: Tue, 07 Jul 2015 12:54:41 -0700
Last Termination State: Terminated
Exit Code: 1
Started: Fri, 07 Jul 2015 12:54:30 -0700
Finished: Fri, 07 Jul 2015 12:54:33 -0700
Ready: False
Restart Count: 5
Conditions:
Type Status
Ready False
Events:
FirstSeen LastSeen Count From SubobjectPath Reason Message
Tue, 07 Jul 2015 12:53:51 -0700 Tue, 07 Jul 2015 12:53:51 -0700 1 {scheduler } scheduled Successfully assigned simmemleak-hra99 to kubernetes-node-tf0f
Tue, 07 Jul 2015 12:53:51 -0700 Tue, 07 Jul 2015 12:53:51 -0700 1 {kubelet kubernetes-node-tf0f} implicitly required container POD pulled Pod container image "gcr.io/google_containers/pause:0.8.0" already present on machine
Tue, 07 Jul 2015 12:53:51 -0700 Tue, 07 Jul 2015 12:53:51 -0700 1 {kubelet kubernetes-node-tf0f} implicitly required container POD created Created with docker id 6a41280f516d
Tue, 07 Jul 2015 12:53:51 -0700 Tue, 07 Jul 2015 12:53:51 -0700 1 {kubelet kubernetes-node-tf0f} implicitly required container POD started Started with docker id 6a41280f516d
Tue, 07 Jul 2015 12:53:51 -0700 Tue, 07 Jul 2015 12:53:51 -0700 1 {kubelet kubernetes-node-tf0f} spec.containers{simmemleak} created Created with docker id 87348f12526a
The Restart Count: 5
indicates that the simmemleak
container in this pod was terminated and restarted 5 times.
You can call get pod
with the -o go-template=...
option to fetch the status of previously terminated containers:
[13:59:01] $ ./cluster/kubectl.sh get pod -o go-template='{{range.status.containerStatuses}}{{"Container Name: "}}{{.name}}{{"\r\nLastState: "}}{{.lastState}}{{end}}' simmemleak-60xbc
Container Name: simmemleak
LastState: map[terminated:map[exitCode:137 reason:OOM Killed startedAt:2015-07-07T20:58:43Z finishedAt:2015-07-07T20:58:43Z containerID:docker://0e4095bba1feccdfe7ef9fb6ebffe972b4b14285d5acdec6f0d3ae8a22fad8b2]][13:59:03] clusterScaleDoc ~/go/src/github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes $
We can see that this container was terminated because reason:OOM Killed
, where OOM stands for Out Of Memory.
The current system only allows resource quantities to be specified on a container. It is planned to improve accounting for resources which are shared by all containers in a pod, such as EmptyDir volumes.
The current system only supports container requests and limits for CPU and Memory. It is planned to add new resource types, including a node disk space resource, and a framework for adding custom resource types.
Kubernetes supports overcommitment of resources by supporting multiple levels of Quality of Service.
Currently, one unit of CPU means different things on different cloud providers, and on different machine types within the same cloud providers. For example, on AWS, the capacity of a node is reported in ECUs, while in GCE it is reported in logical cores. We plan to revise the definition of the cpu resource to allow for more consistency across providers and platforms.