Skip to content

Support project group operations with -g on lab clone and lab project list #206

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
zaquestion opened this issue Aug 10, 2018 · 9 comments

Comments

@zaquestion
Copy link
Owner

Following on from #185 we want to support listing and cloning groups directly without having to parse lab project list results

@krlmlr
Copy link

krlmlr commented Aug 20, 2018

Also for lab project create (#211)?

@dosmanak
Copy link

dosmanak commented Jul 19, 2022

Hello. I put this tiny change into mentioned PR #842. It is only for project list.

@dosmanak
Copy link

Hello. It seems there is not much activity in this project 😿

@zampierilucas
Copy link
Collaborator

zampierilucas commented Sep 26, 2022

@dosmanak most development has moved to https://github.com/aristocratos/btop, as it is the next iteration of bpytop

@alerque
Copy link
Contributor

alerque commented Oct 29, 2022

What does btop have to do with lab?

@zampierilucas
Copy link
Collaborator

@alerque wow, it seems I really messed up some tabs at some point, one was nothing to do with the other really,

@alex0ptr
Copy link

alex0ptr commented Nov 3, 2022

Are you still interested in supporting this? I think we could provide a PR.

@dosmanak
Copy link

dosmanak commented Nov 3, 2022

@alex0ptr I am not sure what do you mean. I've prepared the PR #842 to list projects within groups. It is tiny but working.
for lab clone a PR would be nice.

@alex0ptr
Copy link

alex0ptr commented Nov 3, 2022

Sorry I meant lab clone of course. Ok, I'll look into it in the coming weeks.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants