Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Difference FreeSel and ActiveFT #10

Closed
zpge opened this issue Mar 12, 2025 · 2 comments
Closed

Difference FreeSel and ActiveFT #10

zpge opened this issue Mar 12, 2025 · 2 comments

Comments

@zpge
Copy link

zpge commented Mar 12, 2025

Excuse me. What is the difference between FreeSel and ActiveFT? It looks quite similiar.

@yichen928
Copy link
Owner

Hi, thanks for your interest.

ActiveFT is actually a follow-up work of FreeSel. We highlight several major differences of the two works:

  1. Different settings. ActiveFT is targeted for the data selection for the supervised finetuning of pretrained models. FreeSel focuses on the from-scratch training of versatile models. However, our experiments also show that ActiveFT can also work in the from-scratch training setting.

  2. Methods. ActiveFT adopts global representation format and aims to maximize the distribution similarity between the entire unlabeled pool and the selected subset. FreeSel adopts dense local representation and the goal is to cover diverse and representative local patterns in the selected subset.

  3. Tasks. ActiveFT is mainly designed for classification task given its global representation format. FreeSel can work for different dense semantic tasks.

@zpge
Copy link
Author

zpge commented Mar 13, 2025

Hi, thanks for your interest.

ActiveFT is actually a follow-up work of FreeSel. We highlight several major differences of the two works:

  1. Different settings. ActiveFT is targeted for the data selection for the supervised finetuning of pretrained models. FreeSel focuses on the from-scratch training of versatile models. However, our experiments also show that ActiveFT can also work in the from-scratch training setting.
  2. Methods. ActiveFT adopts global representation format and aims to maximize the distribution similarity between the entire unlabeled pool and the selected subset. FreeSel adopts dense local representation and the goal is to cover diverse and representative local patterns in the selected subset.
  3. Tasks. ActiveFT is mainly designed for classification task given its global representation format. FreeSel can work for different dense semantic tasks.

Thanks. Very clear.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants