Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

JMX access control for readonly and readwrite #5200

Closed
indikasampath2000 opened this issue Jul 20, 2020 · 0 comments
Closed

JMX access control for readonly and readwrite #5200

indikasampath2000 opened this issue Jul 20, 2020 · 0 comments
Assignees
@indikasampath2000
Labels
IceBox Older issues that are not being actively worked on but may be revisited in the future. Type/Improvement Version/6.5.0

Comments

@indikasampath2000
Copy link
Contributor

indikasampath2000 commented Jul 20, 2020 •
edited
Loading

Description:
Java Management Extensions (JMX) provide two access control types call readonly and readwrite. The current carbon JMX implementation doesn't allow to control the access level of the user. A user has full access by default. The implementation must be improved to allow readonly and readwrite.

Suggested Labels:

Suggested Assignees:

Affected Product Version:
All versions.

OS, DB, other environment details and versions:

Steps to reproduce:

Related Issues:
wso2/carbon-kernel#1247
@indikasampath2000 indikasampath2000 self-assigned this Jul 20, 2020
indikasampath2000 added a commit to indikasampath2000/carbon-kernel that referenced this issue Jul 21, 2020
@indikasampath2000
Add access control readonly and readwrite for Carbon JMX
f260970 
Resolves: wso2/product-ei#5200
@indikasampath2000 indikasampath2000 mentioned this issue Jul 21, 2020
Closed
indikasampath2000 added a commit to indikasampath2000/carbon-kernel that referenced this issue Jul 22, 2020
@indikasampath2000
Add access control readonly and readwrite for Carbon JMX
6c8e947 
Resolves wso2/product-ei#5200
@indikasampath2000 indikasampath2000 mentioned this issue Jul 22, 2020
Merged
@dulanjalidilmi dulanjalidilmi mentioned this issue Jul 28, 2020
Closed
This was referenced Apr 27, 2021
Closed
Closed
@anupama-pathirage anupama-pathirage added the IceBox Older issues that are not being actively worked on but may be revisited in the future. label Oct 2, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@indikasampath2000 indikasampath2000

Labels
IceBox Older issues that are not being actively worked on but may be revisited in the future. Type/Improvement Version/6.5.0
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@indikasampath2000 @anupama-pathirage