Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Criteria for including journals/ publishers in the workflow #61

Open
Daniel-Mietchen opened this issue Oct 30, 2016 · 0 comments
Open
Assignees
Labels

Comments

@Daniel-Mietchen
Copy link
Member

So far, we have only looked at publishers where the vast majority or all of their publications are openly licensed. Increasingly, there is openly licensed content elsewhere as well, so it would make sense for the workflows to be more inclusive of different journals or publishers.

What would be good criteria for this? I imagine that http://jats4r.org/ and its schematrons could play a role, but they do not yet cover all the tags that we are working with.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants