Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

barbershop paradox #3

Open
grenade opened this issue May 15, 2014 · 5 comments
Open

barbershop paradox #3

grenade opened this issue May 15, 2014 · 5 comments

Comments

@grenade
Copy link

grenade commented May 15, 2014

The supposition that if one of two simultaneous assumptions leads to a contradiction, the other assumption is also disproved leads to paradoxical consequences.

@michaelhodgins
Copy link

@grenade, could you provide a concrete example?

@necenzurat
Copy link

@michaelhodgins
Copy link

@necenzurat I was hoping for a concrete example, rather that a definition.

@necenzurat
Copy link

it's there

Costin Moise aka necenzurat

Tel: +4 0726.459.188 | Github https://github.com/necenzurat |
Linkedinhttp://www.linkedin.com/in/necenzurat

On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 2:24 PM, Michael Hodgins
[email protected]:

@necenzurat https://github.com/necenzurat I was hoping for a concrete
example, rather that a definition.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/3#issuecomment-43404344
.

@michaelhodgins
Copy link

The page has a nice discussion about how the Barbershop paradox is flawed and is in fact a logical error, but I didn't see an example of it applied to time travel.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants