Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Correct format issue on switch statement answers #32

Open
ZThatWhiteGuyZ opened this issue Aug 6, 2022 · 1 comment · May be fixed by #34
Open

Correct format issue on switch statement answers #32

ZThatWhiteGuyZ opened this issue Aug 6, 2022 · 1 comment · May be fixed by #34
Assignees
Labels
appearance Related to the appearance of resources

Comments

@ZThatWhiteGuyZ
Copy link
Member

What type of suggestion is this?

Issue with appearance or rendering

Describe the current issue or suggestion.

Bad answer format on the nested switch statement problem

Describe the solution you'd like.

New lines between outputs

Describe the origin of this idea. Did it come from an online resource, from a lecture, or some other reachable source?

No response

Additional context

No response

@ZThatWhiteGuyZ ZThatWhiteGuyZ added enhancement New feature or request appearance Related to the appearance of resources and removed enhancement New feature or request labels Aug 6, 2022
@jerrettl jerrettl changed the title Correct format issue on switch statement asnwers Correct format issue on switch statement answers Aug 8, 2022
@jerrettl
Copy link
Member

jerrettl commented Aug 9, 2022

@jerrettl jerrettl linked a pull request Sep 10, 2023 that will close this issue
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this to 📋 Backlog in CS Materials Sep 10, 2023
@jerrettl jerrettl moved this from 📋 Backlog to 🚧 In progress in CS Materials Sep 10, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
appearance Related to the appearance of resources
Projects
Status: 🚧 In progress
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants