You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In the OWL version of the WHO-FIC Foundation, exclusions (and, according to ICD Schema documentation, some index terms) are string-valued annotations, but have references to Foundation entities that are modeled as annotations on annotations. These references are probably not accessible on Protege forms.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
In the case inclusions, the values can be strings or inclusion terms from descendants, modeling inclusions as strings annotations that has its own entity-valued annotation allows the WHO-FIC OWL ontology to use a single property to model both situations. In the Protege 3 content model, the range of baseInclusion is the union of BaseInclusionTerm and SubclassInclusionTerm. Can we model inclusions as either entity URI or strings? (Alpha thalassaemia is an example of an category that has subclass inclusions.)
In the OWL version of the WHO-FIC Foundation, exclusions (and, according to ICD Schema documentation, some index terms) are string-valued annotations, but have references to Foundation entities that are modeled as annotations on annotations. These references are probably not accessible on Protege forms.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: