we should namespace every mixin and function

[renatodeleao]

for consistency and usage with other tools, and to make clear from where's the source of that mixin.

Example

get-color() => qnorr-get-color()

Or

get-color() => qr-get-color()

clever naming is always welcomed..

[tomasmcm]

how about qnorr:get-color() or qr:get-color()?

[renatodeleao]

I'm a fan of the : notation it's CCSy :) I've actually written some utilities in that format to group them, but i'm afraid that's not valid @mixin/@function naming. At least tested on sassmeister.

qnorr is short, so i'm keen to go with the verbose approach.

[renatodeleao]

accidentally find this: which means that namespacing issues with variables and mixins might be a thing of the past: https://css-tricks.com/introducing-sass-modules/

[tomasmcm]

yeah... to use : we'd need to write qnorr\:clearfix().
The sass modules look great! We should test that and update documentation

[renatodeleao]

yeah... to use : we'd need to write qnorr\:clearfix().

🤦‍♂ Yes you're right! we already escaping special characters for breakpoints \@ so i don't think that would be a problem. Nice.

Yup wasn't that excited about sass in many years! Will definitely try this!