-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 40
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
IMU intrinsics and timestamp of pointcloud #15
Comments
Hi @peterWon , Thanks for your interest. The timestamps of the LiDAR point cloud is concerning this frame. Unfortunately, we do not have the timestamps for each point in one frame of point clouds. Regarding the noise of the IMU, please see below: |
您好,请问您两个数据集都没有做传感器之间的时间硬同步对吗? |
hi @lyaprunov , yes. The hardware synchronization was not done. |
Thank you very much for your reply. I am referring to your paper “Optimization-Based Visual-Inertial SLAM Tightly Coupled with Raw GNSS Measurements”. |
Hi @lyaprunov ! sorry for the delayed reply. The dataset from HK and CA share the same IMU model. You can use the one from HK for the CA dataset (although the noise parameters of the IMU may not be highly accurate). Thank you, |
Hi, thanks a lot for your great work!
Currently I'm going to find a dataset which contrains LiDAR and IMU to verify my algorithm. That is why I find this wonderful repository. One problem remains is I want to know whether this dataset has timestamp of each point from LiDAR. Beside, It will be appreciated if you could provide the IMU's noise intrinsics.
Sorry for bothering~
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: