Interop 2024 process retrospective

[foolip]

After Interop 2024 launches, we should do a retrospective to identify things in need of improvement.

I'm filing this issue now mostly to link to one piece of feedback about automatically reproposing features:
#594 (comment)

[jamesbiederbeck]

Is there any consideration of making the interop selection process more transparent? If love to know more about why jpeg XL got passed by this year.

Thanks!

[foolip]

@jamesbiederbeck I will make sure to bring up the JPEG XL proposal and post-launch feedback in our retrospective, to discuss what we should change in our process for next year.

[foolip]

Proposed agenda items:

• Did having 3 rounds work well?
• Did the ranking in round 3 work well?
• Proposal feedback and proposer experience

[jamesbiederbeck]

Thanks @nairnandu! As you are no doubt aware, there has been frustration about this in public forums like reddit, and I'm just the guy who commented about it. I appreciate you coming back with updates on this. If it would help, I would be willing to aggregate public forum discussion for review by any relevant committees.

[foolip]

Closing this as we have completed our retrospective.