-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 27
CSS background-clip #517
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Comments
Use case: a The best way to do this is by having two background layers, one clipped to On The Firefox bug, which means the top layer's A workaround would be to use an absolutely positioned pseudo and We could make the link Similar effect: bubble navigation (live demo) Similar effect: selection-centric navbar(live demo - this is actually my own code replica of a navigation I saw on a supermarket website) Use case: gradient ghost buttons |
The original webkit blog post for adding New chrome bug around how |
We may well want to exclude Typed OM (#490) and the compute-kind-widget-generated tests, which leaves https://wpt.fyi/results/css?label=master&label=experimental&aligned&q=background-clip%20and%20not%20path%3A%2Fcss%2Fcss-ui%2Fcompute-kind-widget-generated%20and%20not%20path%3A%2Fcss%2Fcss-typed-om This doesn't feel like we have many failing tests, but clearly there are other bugs mentioned in this thread. |
New webkit bug for interaction between |
@jsnkuhn For this issue, Firefox(123.0a1 (2024-01-04) ) also has bugs. ![]() |
@yisibl that's a completely different bug (nothing to do with blending, the problem is when a layer is clipped to text and another isn't), which I filed back in 2018 and already linked to above.
|
Thank you for proposing CSS background-clip for inclusion in Interop 2024. We wanted to let you know that this proposal was not selected to be part of Interop this year. The proposal was not on a standards track at the time of proposal selection, which made it unsuitable for inclusion in Interop 2024. Note that this should not be taken as a comment on the technology as a whole, or our willingness to take it up in the future. If the feature is standardized, we would welcome this proposal being resubmitted for a future round of Interop. For an overview of our process, see proposal selection. Thank you again for contributing to Interop 2024! Posted on behalf of the Interop team. |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Description
mdn:
Most existing inconsistencies seem to revolve around the
text
value.The original webkit blog post for adding -webkit-background-clip: text;: https://webkit.org/blog/164/background-clip-text/
Specification
https://drafts.csswg.org/css-backgrounds-4/#background-clip
Open Issues
No response
Tests
https://wpt.fyi/results/css?label=master&label=experimental&aligned&q=background%20clip
Current Implementations
Standards Positions
No response
Browser bug reports
firefox bugs:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=background-clip&list_id=16739518
[meta] background-clip:text issues
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1656784
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1481498
chrome:
Issue 1339290: Make -webkit-background-clip an alias
https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1339290&q=background-clip%20text&can=2
New chrome bug around how background-clip: text; works with position: https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1500148
Developer discussions
No response
Polls & Surveys
No response
Existing Usage
No response
Workarounds
No response
Accessibility Impact
No response
Privacy Impact
No response
Other
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: