Skip to content

em-dashes are better than commas, in some places #72

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
TallTed opened this issue Jan 23, 2025 · 3 comments
Closed

em-dashes are better than commas, in some places #72

TallTed opened this issue Jan 23, 2025 · 3 comments
Labels
propose closing Proposed for closing spec:editorial Minor change in the specification (markup, typo, informative text; class 1 or 2)

Comments

@TallTed
Copy link
Member

TallTed commented Jan 23, 2025

Originally posted by @TallTed in #64 (comment)

I want to make sure that discussion happens on my em-dash change requests which were marked "resolved" in PR #64, but which were not applied nor discussed there, and which I cannot mark "unresolved":

  1. Recognize rdf:dirLangString #64 (comment)

  2. Recognize rdf:dirLangString #64 (comment)

The above are about the lines visible at this permalink, which may no longer be 754–761.

@TallTed
Copy link
Member Author

TallTed commented Jan 27, 2025

I've made another change suggestion on #64, which may obviate this issue, at least for this instance.

@pfps pfps added the spec:editorial Minor change in the specification (markup, typo, informative text; class 1 or 2) label Jan 31, 2025
@pfps
Copy link
Contributor

pfps commented Feb 6, 2025

@TallTed Is there anything more that needs to be done for this?

@pfps pfps added the propose closing Proposed for closing label Feb 6, 2025
@TallTed
Copy link
Member Author

TallTed commented Feb 6, 2025

This can be closed. The issue is now in #83

@TallTed TallTed closed this as completed Feb 6, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
propose closing Proposed for closing spec:editorial Minor change in the specification (markup, typo, informative text; class 1 or 2)
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants