em-dashes are better than commas, in some places #72
Labels
propose closing
Proposed for closing
spec:editorial
Minor change in the specification (markup, typo, informative text; class 1 or 2)
Originally posted by @TallTed in #64 (comment)
I want to make sure that discussion happens on my em-dash change requests which were marked "resolved" in PR #64, but which were not applied nor discussed there, and which I cannot mark "unresolved":
Recognize rdf:dirLangString #64 (comment)
Recognize rdf:dirLangString #64 (comment)
The above are about the lines visible at this permalink, which may no longer be 754–761.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: