Non-parity with N-Triples 1.2 spec draft

[jimsmart]

On both of these page:
https://w3c.github.io/rdf-n-quads/spec/#triple-terms
https://www.w3.org/TR/rdf12-n-quads/#triple-terms

In section 2.2 the text (still?) says a triple term can be assigned to the subject or object of an RDF Triple — which I understand is RDF-star, and not RDF 1.2 (?)

And then the text goes on to say a triple term is denoted by <<( and )>> (which I understand is correct for a triple term as the object) — but the example then uses << and >>, with the triple term in the subject. Which is a bit of a mix up, I believe, and does not match the current N-Triples 1.2 draft, which AFAIU, is correct.

Perhaps I've not explained this well... but if you take a look at the above link... I'm pretty certain that the whole of section 2.2 for N-Quads 1.2 should in fact be the same as section 2.2 in the current N-Triples 1.2 draft:

https://www.w3.org/TR/rdf12-n-triples/#triple-terms
https://w3c.github.io/rdf-n-triples/spec/#triple-terms

Would you like a pull request for this?
Or is it just easier for one of you folk (@gkellogg ?) to make this edit?

[afs]

@jimsmart

Yes, N-Triple, section 2.2 is the current state where it says

A triple term may be the object of an RDF triple.

The issue is not complete resolved yet.
N-quads is not up to date.

Thank you for the report. Focus in the working group is on RDF Concepts and RDF Semantics. The concrete syntax spaces can lag.

Would you like a pull request for this?

Yes, please!