Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Check against i18n checklist for CR transition for wasm 2.0 #1905

Open
w3cbot opened this issue Sep 18, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Check against i18n checklist for CR transition for wasm 2.0 #1905

w3cbot opened this issue Sep 18, 2024 · 1 comment
Labels
cg:webassembly https://www.w3.org/groups/cg/webassembly s:wasm-core https://webassembly.github.io/spec/core/ self_review Write-ups of self-reviews

Comments

@w3cbot
Copy link

w3cbot commented Sep 18, 2024 •
edited by xfq
Loading

This is a tracker issue. Only discuss things here if they are i18n group internal meta-discussions about the issue. Contribute to the actual discussion at the following link:

§ WebAssembly/spec#1806
@w3cbot w3cbot added pending Issue not yet sent to WG, or raised by tracker tool & needing labels. self_review Write-ups of self-reviews tracker i18n is following a discussion, but doesn't require resolution. cg:webassembly https://www.w3.org/groups/cg/webassembly labels Sep 18, 2024
@xfq xfq added s:wasm-core https://webassembly.github.io/spec/core/ and removed pending Issue not yet sent to WG, or raised by tracker tool & needing labels. tracker i18n is following a discussion, but doesn't require resolution. labels Sep 19, 2024
@xfq
Copy link
Member

xfq commented Sep 19, 2024 •
edited
Loading

@plehegar I think we need a wg:wasm label for this?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
cg:webassembly https://www.w3.org/groups/cg/webassembly s:wasm-core https://webassembly.github.io/spec/core/ self_review Write-ups of self-reviews
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@xfq @w3cbot