Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Guidebook pages not using a /guide/ URI and that should be moved to this repository #290

Open
vivienlacourba opened this issue Jan 15, 2025 · 9 comments
Assignees

Comments

@vivienlacourba
Copy link
Member

vivienlacourba commented Jan 15, 2025

Hi @plehegar, @koalie,

While working on the Guidebook redesign I noticed several pages that were mentioning to be part of the Guidebook but were not managed in this repository (they are still in CVS in the W3C datespace).

For each of the following pages could you confirm:

  • If they should be moved to this repository
  • Which section they should be in
  • What you think could be their new URI https://www.w3.org/guide/...

I'll then work with @lcarcone to migrate and redirect them.

If you are aware of other still relevant Guidebook pages that should similarly be moved let us know.


https://www.w3.org/2002/05/rec-tips "Tips for Getting to Recommendation Faster"

  • New URI: /guide/standards-track/rec-tips
  • Last update: 2015-09-02 by Coralie
  • Linked from:
    • W3C Process
    • Guidebook (index.md, process/adv-notice.md, process/charter.md)

https://www.w3.org/2003/01/republishing/ "In-place modification of W3C Technical Reports"

  • New URI: /guide/standards-track/republishing
  • Last update: 2018-04-26 by Plh
  • Linked from:
    • W3C Process
    • Guidebook (index.md, transitions/index.html, transitions/details.md, transitions/nextstep.html, transitions/wide-review-request.html)

https://www.w3.org/2002/10/election-howto "How to organize an Advisory Board or Technical Architecture Group election" (cf #241)

  • New URI: /guide/process/election
  • Last update: 2024-10-08 by Xueyuan
  • Linked from:
    • W3C Process
    • It is not yet linked from the Guidebook
    • board-vote auto-reply message

https://www.w3.org/2003/04/closing-group.html "How to Close a Group (Team notes)" (cf #278)

  • New URI: /guide/process/closing-wg-implementation
  • Linked from:
    • Guidebook (process/closing-wg.md)

https://www.w3.org/2016/04/cg-support/ "W3C Team support for W3C Community Groups"

https://www.w3.org/2005/05/tr-versions "Version Management in W3C Technical Reports"

https://www.w3.org/2005/07/13-pubrules-disclosure "Linking to Patent Policy Disclosure Pages"

https://www.w3.org/2005/07/13-nsuri "URIs for W3C Namespaces"

https://www.w3.org/2020/01/registering-mediatypes.html "Register an Internet Media Type for a W3C Spec"

https://www.w3.org/2005/04/xpointer-policy "XPointer Scheme Name Registry Policy"

https://www.w3.org/2007/04/patent-exception-management.html "W3C Procedures for Launching and Operating a Patent Advisory Group (PAG)"

  • New URI: /guide/process/pag with title "Patent Advisory Group procedures"
  • Last update: 2016-05-10 by Coralie and previously Steve and Ian
  • Linked from:
    • ...
@koalie
Copy link
Contributor

koalie commented Jan 15, 2025

I think all of them could move to this repo.
The ones I'm less sure about are the pub rules documentation (https://www.w3.org/2005/07/13-pubrules-disclosure "Linking to Patent Policy Disclosure Pages") and the xpointer-policy

@koalie
Copy link
Contributor

koalie commented Jan 15, 2025

Also, https://www.w3.org/2003/04/closing-group.html
cf. issue #278 raised by @plehegar

@vivienlacourba
Copy link
Member Author

I think all of them could move to this repo. The ones I'm less sure about are the pub rules documentation (https://www.w3.org/2005/07/13-pubrules-disclosure "Linking to Patent Policy Disclosure Pages")

Discussing with @deniak this page is not relevant anymore, I removed it and redirected it to the pubrules.

and the xpointer-policy

Indeed me too. As it seems specific to the XPointer technology it might not need to be part of the Guidebook. @plh please confirm.

@vivienlacourba
Copy link
Member Author

vivienlacourba commented Jan 23, 2025

FYI I edited the issue description to add the last update date and author for each of those pages along with proposed new URIs

@vivienlacourba
Copy link
Member Author

Also, https://www.w3.org/2003/04/closing-group.html cf. issue #278 raised by @plehegar

Added to the above list.

@vivienlacourba
Copy link
Member Author

@plehegar, @koalie three other documents that could as well be moved to the Guidebook:

W3C Procedures for Launching and Operating a Patent Advisory Group (PAG)
https://www.w3.org/2007/04/patent-exception-management.html

Relicensing Unfinished W3C Specifications
https://www.w3.org/2014/12/relicense.html

[Draft] Proposal for Community-Based Specification Maintenance
https://www.w3.org/2010/08/26-maintenance.html

@vivienlacourba
Copy link
Member Author

vivienlacourba commented Jan 27, 2025

@plehegar, @koalie three other documents that could as well be moved to the Guidebook:

W3C Procedures for Launching and Operating a Patent Advisory Group (PAG) https://www.w3.org/2007/04/patent-exception-management.html

I edited the issue description to add this document to the list of doc to migrate to the guidebook.

Relicensing Unfinished W3C Specifications https://www.w3.org/2014/12/relicense.html

@koalie to move it under https://www.w3.org/policies/specification-relicense .

[Draft] Proposal for Community-Based Specification Maintenance https://www.w3.org/2010/08/26-maintenance.html

@plehegar indicated that this one is not relevant anymore and will update the document to clarify its status.

@vivienlacourba
Copy link
Member Author

vivienlacourba commented Jan 27, 2025

@vivienlacourba
Copy link
Member Author

vivienlacourba commented Feb 3, 2025

@koalie, @plehegar, with the merge of #303 we are almost done with this issue, here is a summary of what remains:

For @koalie:

For @plehegar:

Once you will have completed those I will take care of setting up the redirects and removing those from CVS.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants