You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Section 5.6 says that GPC is explicitly not intended to prevent "a publisher targeting ads to a user on its website based on that user’s previous activity on that same site". But Sections 5.2 and 5.3 say that in Colorado and Connecticut, "the GPC signal will be intended to communicate a request to opt out of both the sale of their personal information and the use of their personal information for targeted advertising."
At face value I thought these were in conflict with one another. Per the side chat in today's meeting, perhaps I am mistaken, and 5.2/5.3 are only trying to refer to "cross-site targeted advertising" rather than all "targeted advertising".
If indeed the phrase "targeted advertising" is meant to always imply "cross-site", we should either explicitly say that, or use the full phrase each time. (I am personally nervous about explicitly saying that the "cross-site" part is implicit: we are discussion the specific details of many laws, and I wouldn't want us to accidentally mis-characterize some jurisdiction's law based on our adopting a non-universal conventional meaning for the phrase.)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Section 5.6 says that GPC is explicitly not intended to prevent "a publisher targeting ads to a user on its website based on that user’s previous activity on that same site". But Sections 5.2 and 5.3 say that in Colorado and Connecticut, "the GPC signal will be intended to communicate a request to opt out of both the sale of their personal information and the use of their personal information for targeted advertising."
At face value I thought these were in conflict with one another. Per the side chat in today's meeting, perhaps I am mistaken, and 5.2/5.3 are only trying to refer to "cross-site targeted advertising" rather than all "targeted advertising".
If indeed the phrase "targeted advertising" is meant to always imply "cross-site", we should either explicitly say that, or use the full phrase each time. (I am personally nervous about explicitly saying that the "cross-site" part is implicit: we are discussion the specific details of many laws, and I wouldn't want us to accidentally mis-characterize some jurisdiction's law based on our adopting a non-universal conventional meaning for the phrase.)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: