Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

WAI-Adapt fallbacks to equivalent microformats #221

Open
Seirdy opened this issue Sep 13, 2022 · 4 comments
Open

WAI-Adapt fallbacks to equivalent microformats #221

Seirdy opened this issue Sep 13, 2022 · 4 comments
Assignees

Comments

@Seirdy
Copy link

Seirdy commented Sep 13, 2022

I noticed that the Comparison of ways to use vocabulary in content page on the personalization-semantics wiki didn't mention Microformats. Microformats add semantic meaning to individual HTML elements; this is in contrast to document-level semantic formats like Microdata, RDFa, and JSON-LD.

There's a 1-1 mapping between many microformats and values in the WAI-Adapt Content Module. Several values under section 4.3.4 (values for "purpose") are already specified in h-card microformats2, for instance. You can find plenty of live h-card implementations on the IndieWeb Webring directory.

w3c/coga Issue 69 also references overlap between "destination" vocabulary and rel values. Microformats leverage rel attributes like rel="license" and rel="home"; these seem equivalent to the "terms" and "home" values for destination attributes.

I propose the addition of microformats2 to the comparison wiki page, and would support either merging the content module with microformats or specifying a mapping for fallback.

POSSE note from https://seirdy.one/notes/2022/09/13/wai-adapt-fallbacks-to-equivalent-microformats/

@matatk
Copy link
Contributor

matatk commented Oct 3, 2022

Hi @Seirdy. Thank you for your feedback and suggestions. I have am looking into this for the group, and we plan to discuss it soon. We'll post an update on this thread when we've discussed it.

@matatk
Copy link
Contributor

matatk commented Oct 10, 2022

We discussed microformats on our call today (draft minutes). We have some concerns about accessibility, and will look into those, but we will be adding microformats to the wiki page, in order to ensure we have a thorough comparison. I'll be working on this soon.

@matatk matatk self-assigned this Oct 10, 2022
@Seirdy
Copy link
Author

Seirdy commented Oct 31, 2022

@matatk Regarding the accessibility considerations: I believe these have been solved by HTML5 elements such as data and time.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants
@matatk @Seirdy and others