Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Handle "xBUTNUMBER" xlogin cases better #1148

Open
Toaster192 opened this issue Sep 25, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Handle "xBUTNUMBER" xlogin cases better #1148

Toaster192 opened this issue Sep 25, 2024 · 0 comments
Milestone

Comments

@Toaster192
Copy link
Collaborator

Either add a hardcoded check for xBUTNUMBER API calls that in case the request doesn't return anything, tries again with just the BUTNUMBER ?
Otherwise we could also handle this via #1147 by forcing reverify of people with this kind xlogin.

There is also the "xp" FP login bullshit but I don't think there is any obvious solution to that one and it should affect only a tiny amount of people (or I guess it doesn't matter to us as those logins never could get to the database in the past as FIT generated their own login and now they are forced to use BUTNUMBER instead so we don't care that their VUT xlogin doesn't match the FIT xlogin). If there are other weird exceptions we should track them in this issue.

@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this to Backlog in Rubbergod Sep 25, 2024
@Toaster192 Toaster192 added this to the Verify Rework milestone Sep 25, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: Backlog
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant