You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Based on your code, it seems that you crop the center from a 540x540 image to get the 270x270 image as input, and for annotation, you crop the center from a 540x540 annotation to get the 80x80 annotation as output/ground truth. I wonder why for input you only use the center part instead od the original size of the image and also for annotation why you don't keep it consistent with the input size (e.g. 270x270 or 540x540), instead, you use a smaller outputsize?
Could you simply explain this to me?
Thank you!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
We start with a patch double the size of the input.
540 x 540 patch
augmentation
central crop: input size = 270x270
output size of network = 80x80
We use an initial image double the size of the input before augmentation to reduce border effects during augmentation (for example, rotation ~ 45 degrees)
Based on your code, it seems that you crop the center from a 540x540 image to get the 270x270 image as input, and for annotation, you crop the center from a 540x540 annotation to get the 80x80 annotation as output/ground truth. I wonder why for input you only use the center part instead od the original size of the image and also for annotation why you don't keep it consistent with the input size (e.g. 270x270 or 540x540), instead, you use a smaller outputsize?
Could you simply explain this to me?
Thank you!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: