Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

eval resutls of stage1 and stage 2 #259

Open
wustone1995 opened this issue Jul 18, 2023 · 1 comment
Open

eval resutls of stage1 and stage 2 #259

wustone1995 opened this issue Jul 18, 2023 · 1 comment

Comments

@wustone1995
Copy link

wustone1995 commented Jul 18, 2023

Hi, thanks for sharing your great work! I have a problem about reproducing the results on Consep dataset. For stage2, it's easy to obtain a result close to the one post in paper (like dice 0.83, original is 0.85). However, the result of stage 1 is very bad, like dice 0.3 or worse. But the log shows no big difference of these two stage (stage1 epoch50 dice=0.78, stage2 epoch50 dice=0.83). Is this a common scene? or something i make wrong?

@simongraham
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi,

I'm a little confused because you say that the Dice is 0.3 in stage 1, then you say it is 0.78 in the next sentence. Maybe you mean PQ is 0.3?

Anyway, I will put some notes here and hopefully this will help.

Despite the Dice being pretty good (binary segmentation performance) at stage 1, the HV outputs were not great and needed the second stage to get good results. Therefore, you will find that the instance segmentation results will not be good at stage 1 because the HV map is what is being used to split the nuclei.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants