You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Nov 17, 2021. It is now read-only.
If there is an existing object with the wrong gc-tag, then this most likely indicates either a misunderstanding of the gc-tag, or a hazardous conflict with someone else's kubecfg pipeline.
I think it would be reasonable to abort (by default) if a conflicting gc-tag is detected as the update is proceeding, with a suitably explanatory error message. It needs to be possible to optionally weaken this to a warning so that legitimate use cases remain possible (eg: renaming the gc-tag, adopting resources created from an abandoned kubecfg pipeline).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
If there is an existing object with the wrong gc-tag, then this most likely indicates either a misunderstanding of the gc-tag, or a hazardous conflict with someone else's kubecfg pipeline.
I think it would be reasonable to abort (by default) if a conflicting gc-tag is detected as the update is proceeding, with a suitably explanatory error message. It needs to be possible to optionally weaken this to a warning so that legitimate use cases remain possible (eg: renaming the gc-tag, adopting resources created from an abandoned kubecfg pipeline).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: