You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi author, could you please disclose the setting of the teacher forcing ratio used for the human3.6 dataset? and Other training parameters (training epoch, batch_size) if you would like to make them public.
I tried to reproduce your method on this dataset but got terrible results on testing data. However, the performance on the validation set was good. I am guessing if that's the problem with the teacher forcing ratio that makes inconsistency between training and testing?
Did you observe the performance gap (visually) between the validation and testing set?
Thank you.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi author, could you please disclose the setting of the teacher forcing ratio used for the human3.6 dataset? and Other training parameters (training epoch, batch_size) if you would like to make them public.
I tried to reproduce your method on this dataset but got terrible results on testing data. However, the performance on the validation set was good. I am guessing if that's the problem with the teacher forcing ratio that makes inconsistency between training and testing?
Did you observe the performance gap (visually) between the validation and testing set?
Thank you.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: